>>10899144Holy fuck Anon-kun!
The answer is 3.
No fucking ifs, ands, or, buts.
It's the lowest cup. Or did Diogenes point when destroying the idea of cuppyness break you?
That it shattered your reality so hard, that definitions of things are now so uncertain to you.
Or are you so "I was X before it was cool" That using Mason Jars as glasses wasn't just a cliche,
It was a retard obvious cliche that it's cliche isn't just the concept itself, but that retards think is original and progressive with each new item presented.
Regardless of frequency or like for like combination. Fucking wow! Jam/Mason Jars as drinking glasses? So quirky and original.
I bet you now have things that don't even work as the item you're claiming it to be, or function as.
You sicken me. A least peacocks still function in practicality.
Your attention whore mentality is forced to exert the mental illness in ever greater degrees.
But you delude it as separating from the herd because of individuality.
That it's caused dysfunctionality to be used as a ""conversation starter"". (Mental dysfunction is trait causing harm to normal human life).
The absurd substitution at your place must prompt the "are you fine for money" conversation a lot huh?
But that's fine as any thing odd is just to have chance to satiating your desperation to be validated as unique.
It's somewhat kinda okay in in what is a cup, as it's just holds liquid till your mouth.
But how can you think that 3 is a fucking cup at all?
Many variations of a cup exist. But I can assure you. There is NONE that have only blind junctions.
And the cups that do, they have both blind and open. Those are dribble cups.
They aren't meant for pouring into other things, and are stopped by holing the cup correctly.
A vessel that has two blind junctions with no valves does not I think, have a name, other than useless.
Even drinking horns are clearly defined away from pure cup. So a cup must at rest, retain fluid.
Tl;Dr
You're dumbshit.
