>>10894509Wasn't the hypotenuse blue or is my memory fucking with me again?
Anyway, to answer your question from the sum of all the things that were said in the past 10 threads that you or whoever else spammed here:
Yes, you can ignore the fact that you're using a complex number a length, but you then run into a far more serious problem, the one where you divide by zero. In order to produce sine and cosine, you must:
and , and good luck ever coming with an explanation to these
If the division by zero just wasn't enough for you, this triangle must further satisfy and good luck finding an exponent that makes a reality unless . Now if all of this still isn't enough for you, you can draw a circle around every right triangle such that the hypotenuse of it acts as the radius of the circle (as is the case for pic related). Now if you think really hard about this, you'd notice that this is a circle of radius zero and therefor a diameter and circumference of zero as well, meaning that the ratio of the circumference to the diameter -- , is in fact , which leads you to (in the specific rotation of your triangle) , meaning that will be for every angle of rotation. Now you end up with which is even weirder, as if wasn't.
I'm not going to act ignorant and tell you not to use complex lengths because some arbitrary convention tells us not to, but you must solve the above issues to legitimize your triangle and unless you do, it is illegitimate.
