>>10812970>holo hall Literal projection..
Why are these faggots so blind, the obvious flaw that it's inefficient.
Why can't it be a 3d data structure that implodes all possibility at all locations.
Square peg, round hole.
Concepts are just holes looking to get pegged.
Objects will try to fit into any concept if you're not looking.
So focus on the object must be a priority.
There is case where you'd allow a peg to permiscue.
When it's more likely to have been miss measured, than the acrobatics that may explain it.
If it talks like a fag and it's shit's all retarded. Something's wrong.
The Big Bang is critically flawed.
It imposes that matter exists without any causeation to its existence before the event.
Furthermore is has rolled a critical miss upon Redshift becoming evident.
Instead of scrapping it and starting again.
It was patched with a analogy of a balloon when interpreting the data set.
Over 30 years, a logical fallacy being seen as true. Two massive systems treated as one.
With a force made up, that spawns from nothing. Used as a 'rational' way to explain it.
This not a theory, it's operationalization.
Voids and clusters may be defined by each other.
But I can't conceive why anyone would make the lesser potential, act upon the higher.
That's pure insanity.
Even without considering that generally all other measurements are connotative the opposite function.
Let alone inventing a force you can't measure to explain it.
In this method I prescribe, existence is exhibiting a lenseing via collapse.
That collapse is inherent. Because a factor exists without resolve point.
Giving the illusion of time, space, and motion.
It would be like the effect one has visually when they come to a stop, after a long time in motion.
Extreme version would be a dolly zoom effect they do for movies.
"Rutherford, this is system of equation!"
"For Christ's sake, Soddy, don't call it equation. They'll have our heads off as Kinematics."
pi vertices imposing.
