>>10460130not him, but do you even know what that phrase means, or are you just parroting a buzzphrase?
>The point of automation is to simplify the complex. The benefits vanish when you need a fucking engineer to operate a machineexcept it doesnt, because you only need one engineer to watch after many machines, which are all vastly more efficient than more "simple" methods.
I know what you're trying to convey, that overengineering complexity for complexities sake can be detrimental, but blanket statement saying automation benefits disappear because someone has to watch over it is asinine.