/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #10443798

11KiB, 135x135, DD8DE14D-B3DF-49B2-AA70-8AE5FD2D5BC0.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Wed 06 Mar 23:12:53 2019 No.10443798 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>10443819 >>10443832 >>10443837 >>10443859 >>10443871 >>10443910 >>10443934 >>10444239 >>10444690 >>10444956 >>10444961

>Site claims to be about science and reason
>It’s actually just liberals getting triggered over microaggressions
Why do liberals pretend that they are scientifically minded? How do we stop them from further infesting science with their shit?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Mar 2019 23:21:09 No.10443819 Report

Quoted By:

>>10443798
>>Site claims to be about science and reason
No, it has always been a site about fedoras circle stroking their unwarranted egos.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Mar 2019 23:24:42 No.10443832 Report

Quoted By:

>>10443798
Complete lack of self-awareness
At least Conservapedia admits they are biased

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Mar 2019 23:26:40 No.10443837 Report

Quoted By: >>10443852 >>10443947 >>10444956

>>10443798
>a few liberals get triggered over microaggressions
>THE WHOLE SITE IS JUST THAT
Do you consider yourself "scientifically minded"?
Also, not science or math.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Mar 2019 23:26:50 No.10443838 Report

Quoted By:

>proceeds to libel scientist I dislike a white nationalist

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Mar 2019 23:33:32 No.10443852 Report

Quoted By:

>>10443837
>THE WHOLE SITE IS JUST THAT
Yes it is

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Mar 2019 23:36:11 No.10443858 Report

Quoted By: >>10443865 >>10443875 >>10443934

This website claims it was created to present the clear "rational" take on subjects without Wikipedia's "word-mingling" and "presenting both sides" on important topics.
In reality it's just full of political "hot takes" you would see from the likes of PZ Myeres. Basically nothing more than a condensed form of blogspam.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Mar 2019 23:36:14 No.10443859 Report

Quoted By:

>>10443798
FYI, any polarized partisan movement seems to be liable to their bias when it comes to anything, science included.
Maybe it has something to do with believing in an extreme view that is all antithesis or thesis, no synthesis.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Mar 2019 23:38:23 No.10443865 Report

Quoted By:

>>10443858
It's Resetera of Wikis

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Mar 2019 23:41:27 No.10443871 Report

Quoted By: >>10443879 >>10444068

>>10443798

rationalwiki exists to document stupid shit muslims, jews, christians, etc say and do

if you use it for anything else, you're a moron end of story.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO doubt.jpg, 18KiB, 282x415

Anonymous Wed 06 Mar 2019 23:43:07 No.10443875 Report

Quoted By: >>10443879 >>10443958 >>10444619

>>10443858

>This website claims it was created to present the clear "rational" take on subjects without Wikipedia's "word-mingling" and "presenting both sides" on important topics.

Completely fucking wrong. It exists because Conservapedia's admin banned all his libertarian users, who then went over to form Rationalwiki. This is because he was/is a christcuck and could not handle criticism of his religion, even by soft libertarian standards.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Mar 2019 23:45:31 No.10443879 Report

Quoted By: >>10443886

>>10443871
Except RW only attacks Christians while kissing Muslims and Jews ass

>>10443875
>RW
>libertarian
Lmao

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Mar 2019 23:48:10 No.10443883 Report

Quoted By: >>10443954 >>10444354

i for one like rationalwiki. if you ever read a wikipedia article that leaves you confused (take for example the Earth Battery wikipedia page, it's garbage) just look it up on rational wiki and you'll see them snarkily shut down bullshit crap

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Mar 2019 23:48:48 No.10443886 Report

Quoted By:

>>10443879
We deserve it, as God's Chosen, your masters and betters.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Mar 2019 23:56:19 No.10443910 Report

Quoted By: >>10443919 >>10443920 >>10443941 >>10443956

>>10443798
>gets triggered by an article on rationalwiki making fun of something he likes
>goes on /sci/ to compassion about it
Awww, wuts wong my special widdle snowflake?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Mar 2019 23:58:34 No.10443919 Report

Quoted By: >>10443923

>>10443910
Make fun of things all you want but i draw the line at slander. Can't wait until they get BTFO in British libel court

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Mar 2019 23:59:08 No.10443920 Report

Quoted By:

>>10443910
>no u
t. RW Admin

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 00:00:24 No.10443922 Report

Quoted By: >>10444692

RationalWiki is intended to be the antithesis of Conservapedia.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 00:00:48 No.10443923 Report

Quoted By: >>10443941 >>10443956

>>10443919
Who did dey swander? Show us where your widdle booboo is.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 00:05:38 No.10443934 Report

Quoted By:

>>10443798
>>10443858
I always thought it was just a snarky jab at various political/science topics not unlike Encyclopedia Dramatica, just without all the bitcoin miners, dick jokes, and malware ads.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 00:09:38 No.10443941 Report

Quoted By:

>>10443910
>>10443923
Writing like this should be a capital offense

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 00:13:01 No.10443947 Report

Quoted By:

>>10443837
It is. Look any person and they literally have “good” and “bad” categories for the women vs le problematic things they say.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 00:14:55 No.10443954 Report

Quoted By:

>>10443883
Unless it involves trans people then feelings are what matter.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 00:16:20 No.10443956 Report

Quoted By:

>>10443910
>>10443923
go Back to you baby fur forum.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 00:16:35 No.10443958 Report

Quoted By: >>10443969 >>10443978 >>10443982 >>10444230 >>10444297

>>10443875

>Additionally, it's worth nothing that RationalWiki is deemed to have a slight (politically center-left) bias compared to Wikipedia — and that's no surprise, as we explicitly do not aim for a neutral point of view. Note also that the comparison made here to Wikipedia is not to be confused with us considering RationalWiki an encyclopedia (we don't).

>One of many ways which distinguishes RW from encyclopedias (e.g. Wikipedia) is that we openly avoid any pretentions to neutrality on controversial subjects. When one side of an issue has the scientific consensus to back it up, and the other clearly doesn't, part of our mission is placing the two side by side and calling it like we sees it.

Right from their "About" page.
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO hqdefault.jpg, 27KiB, 480x360

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 00:20:14 No.10443969 Report

Quoted By:

>>10443958
>calling it like we sees it

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 00:23:58 No.10443978 Report

Quoted By: >>10443999 >>10444687

>>10443958
>scientific consensus
Explain the scientific consensus on how microaggressing hurts trans people. It also calls people who don’t believe in unscientific conspiracy theories like systematic racism as far right extremists

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 00:25:59 No.10443982 Report

Quoted By: >>10443999 >>10444551

>>10443958
What’s the scientific consensus on white priveledge and the patriarchy because they sure love to talk about that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 00:27:51 No.10443989 Report

Quoted By: >>10444017

Because when they were insecure bullied kids the only thing they could do to feel powerful was flaunt their atheism on their likely Christian family. Part of this was to pretend they understood biology and physics and that just snowballs into being a Pretentious wannabe that doesn’t really have anything worthwhile to day

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 00:32:48 No.10443999 Report

Quoted By: >>10444005

>>10443982
>>10443978
RationalWiki takes the side of academia in all issues. These topics are frequently discussed by scholars

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 00:35:48 No.10444005 Report

Quoted By:

>>10443999
Too bad academia doesn’t = science. If it did they wouldn’t be blaming blacks lower iq scores on white privilege.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 0d233be4d153e3948d59627ba7e6c0e9 (...).jpg, 7KiB, 196x196

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 00:39:59 No.10444017 Report

Quoted By: >>10444018 >>10444614 >>10444707

>>10443989
Otherkin are often confused with transgender individuals, despite the fact that the two are in no way related, and that transgender people are supported by both science and law. Otherkin themselves are known to make the comparison, however, and many of them claim to be engaged in a "civil rights struggle", while critics contend that they are delusional or mentally ill. [16]

Many modern reactionaries argue that, if one must accept trans people as having valid ideas, then one must also accept otherkin for the same reason. This comparison is flawed.[17]

[17] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoUORx0LeIc

Their reference is a youtube video you can't make this shit up.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 00:41:08 No.10444018 Report

Quoted By:

>>10444017
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Otherkin

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 00:44:07 No.10444025 Report

Quoted By: >>10444072 >>10444719 >>10446597

Why they make no sense

>The otherkin fandom is largely fictional, for three glaring reasons:
>Most otherkin identify as an animal that is perceived as "cool" or "majestic" in Western culture, such as wolves, foxes, dolphins and bears. Otherkin never identify as insects or vermin, although these animals make up the majority of known animal species. This shows that they are pretending and want to have a glamourous value attached to them.
>If otherkin were truly more like non-humans than humans, then they would not be giving themselves the designation "otherkin" because they would not be able to comprehend and use human language. Not to mention, they would not be using the Internet.
>We don't truly understand the animals and their thought processes enough to know how someone can identify as one of them.

Comedy gold

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 00:59:36 No.10444068 Report

Quoted By:

>>10443871
>rationalwiki exists to document stupid shit muslims, jews, christians, etc say and do
Christians, New Agers and anyone who's not a Communist*

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 01:03:18 No.10444072 Report

Quoted By:

>>10444025
The irony is how terrible all those arguments are

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 01:04:58 No.10444075 Report

Quoted By:

Ah yes, we, the rationalwiki, have a monopoly on facts and science
>proceeds to cite Foucult and Jean Paul Satire

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 02:28:37 No.10444230 Report

Quoted By:

>>10443958
>slight
understatement of the century

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO chad rationalist.jpg, 256KiB, 2047x788

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 02:34:16 No.10444239 Report

Quoted By: >>10444259

>>10443798

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 02:43:08 No.10444259 Report

Quoted By:

>>10444239
epic cringe

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 03:00:17 No.10444297 Report

Quoted By: >>10444313 >>10444831 >>10444973 >>10445131

>>10443958

again if you're using RW for anything other than poking fun at religious bullshit you're a moron

the site has one purpose, and it achieves it. It's probably one of the best theology primers on the web.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 03:06:07 No.10444313 Report

Quoted By:

>>10444297
hmmm I wonder who could be behind this post?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 03:12:37 No.10444329 Report

Quoted By: >>10444366 >>10444618 >>10444636

Anybody who is genuinely scientifically minded is able to completely ignore the culture war. You are able to not be tirggered by either the liberals' shit or by the conservatives' shit and just get on with the business of science.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 03:28:04 No.10444354 Report

Quoted By: >>10444569

>>10443883
>i for one like rationalwiki

>>>/reddit/

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 03:37:50 No.10444366 Report

Quoted By: >>10444583 >>10444598

>>10444329
>haha bro just ignore the people attempted to eviscerate science for ideological ends i mean are u like a fag or something lmao
you are a literal cuckold

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 05:13:43 No.10444551 Report

Quoted By:

>>10443982
the consensus is that they are real and harmful to society
you are on the outs if you think this is not the scientific consensus

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 05:23:49 No.10444569 Report

Quoted By:

>>10444354
meh, what’s your stance? denyopedia is better?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 05:36:17 No.10444583 Report

Quoted By: >>10444592 >>10444612

>>10444366
Everything you wrote sounds like it was written by someone who is twelve years of age.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO gettyimages-94815747-1024x1024.jpg, 571KiB, 1024x845

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 05:38:41 No.10444592 Report

Quoted By: >>10444601

>>10444583
We subsist not on political philosophies or theories but the land and what it can give us in food and raw materials - Adolf Hitler

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 05:41:21 No.10444598 Report

Quoted By: >>10444606 >>10444625

>>10444366
>implying that rationalwiki and gender studies majors have any power to "eviscerate" science
that's all in your paranoid, non-scientific, /pol/-dominated mind

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 05:43:04 No.10444601 Report

Quoted By: >>10444679

>>10444592
What does Adolf Hitler have to do with science?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 05:45:30 No.10444606 Report

Quoted By: >>10444610

>>10444598
>the """culture war""" is just rationalwiki
0 iq take

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 05:46:20 No.10444610 Report

Quoted By:

>>10444606
that's specifically not what i said

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 05:46:31 No.10444612 Report

Quoted By: >>10444616

>>10444583
everything you wrote sounds like it was written by a cuckold

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 05:46:42 No.10444614 Report

Quoted By:

>>10444017
>Supported by Science
No it's not
>And law
That isn't an argument

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 05:48:14 No.10444616 Report

Quoted By: >>10444620

>>10444612
What even is a cuckold? Who even understands this lingo? Who even knows what you are talking about?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 05:50:06 No.10444618 Report

Quoted By: >>10444630

>>10444329
Not when they shove it into science. You have no idea how many fucking biologists have been trying to prove that all races are the same or that gender doesn't exist and when they can't prove it they just state that it's a fact. psychology is far far far worse and colleges of science try to convert you to being a liberal.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 05:50:51 No.10444619 Report

Quoted By:

>>10443875
You're a fucking dumbass. Any self-styled conservative or libtard that wallows around in a circle jerk cesspit like """rational""' wiki or conservapedia has no real opinion and is to be disregarded immediately.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 05:50:59 No.10444620 Report

Quoted By:

>>10444616
>i'll pretend to be functionally illiterate, that'll show him

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 05:51:56 No.10444625 Report

Quoted By: >>10444635 >>10446605

>>10444598
They do. They are pushing for non scientific beliefs and trying to shape the opinion of it. While they aren't changing literal data (that I know of) they are infesting actual scientists minds with unscientific thinking and demanding that only acceptable answers be used. For example black children are too fucking dumb to pass the mirror test so the scientists who conducted the study had to say it was do to cultural reasons.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 05:52:48 No.10444630 Report

Quoted By: >>10444634

>>10444618
But I thought biology and psychology were not real sciences...

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 05:54:33 No.10444634 Report

Quoted By:

>>10444630
This, only comp sci is a science, everything else is a meme or a religion.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 05:55:00 No.10444635 Report

Quoted By: >>10444641

>>10444625
I'm not going to sit here and be told by political hacks what is and is not science. Fuck off

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 05:55:02 No.10444636 Report

Quoted By:

>>10444329
Why do you even care about what people care about LMAO?

Just stop thinking, retard.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 05:57:03 No.10444641 Report

Quoted By:

>>10444635
>s-stop with the wrongthink right now y-you hack

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 05:58:50 No.10444644 Report

Quoted By: >>10444714

this is probably the worst thread on /sci/ right now

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO theoretical trash.jpg, 54KiB, 1024x554

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 06:13:09 No.10444679 Report

Quoted By:

>>10444601
"What does the most important man in the world have to do with science"
Look how retarded you sound.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 06:17:33 No.10444687 Report

Quoted By:

>>10443978
They'll get activists to harass and bully anyone who disagrees and then once all the opposition shuts up they'll claim they have a consensus.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 06:19:45 No.10444690 Report

Quoted By: >>10444817

>>10443798
You may not like it but reality has a liberal bias

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 06:20:43 No.10444692 Report

Quoted By:

>>10443922
So pants on head retarded

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 06:26:50 No.10444707 Report

Quoted By:

>>10444017
How can you justify accepting the claim that a woman is born in a man's body but not that a wolf is born in a human's body. Both are entirely subjective to the individual and are based only on personal feelings and delusions.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 06:30:38 No.10444714 Report

Quoted By:

>>10444644
The posters in the second half of this thread are literally sub-/pol/-tier. They may actually be from conservapedia or something

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO what-are-the-gender-signs-0375be (...).png, 548KiB, 1600x1248

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 06:32:31 No.10444719 Report

Quoted By:

>>10444025
Oh but some insane tranny faggots that identify as a agender: version gendervoid or some other flavour of retarded is totally ok according to the folks at RW

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 07:37:34 No.10444817 Report

Quoted By: >>10444824

>>10444690
This. People who cut their dicks off are women.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 07:44:53 No.10444824 Report

Quoted By: >>10444825 >>10444966

>>10444817
I did not cut my dick off, incle magatard.

I just had 90% of the skin of my penis and balls severed so it could be inverted into a cavity within my pelvis that is then sewn shut.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 07:46:57 No.10444825 Report

Quoted By:

>>10444824
You are an interesting guy

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1543758804364.jpg, 23KiB, 450x444

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 07:51:59 No.10444831 Report

Quoted By:

>>10444297
>the site has one purpose, and it achieves it. It's probably one of the best theology primers on the web.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 08:20:56 No.10444889 Report

Quoted By: >>10444971

ITT: butthurt christfags, anti-vaxxers, stormfags.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 09:27:00 No.10444956 Report

Quoted By: >>10446409

>>10443837
Nigger
>>10443798
>Internet site
>Claims
They aren't peer reviewed so they can suck my ass

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 09:30:53 No.10444961 Report

Quoted By:

>>10443798
Guys, this is exactly what the fuck I am talking about. How will this information hub influence the internet sphere? What happens if they become a credible source? Does this influence online politics? How does anonymity affect political views?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 09:37:38 No.10444966 Report

Quoted By: >>10445106

>>10444824
Back to Discord

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 09:40:00 No.10444971 Report

Quoted By: >>10446699

>>10444889
t. NPC libtard

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 09:40:16 No.10444973 Report

Quoted By:

>>10444297
>again if you're using RW for anything you're a moron
lmftfy

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 11:28:48 No.10445106 Report

Quoted By:

>>10444966
Back to 4chan

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 11:44:48 No.10445131 Report

Quoted By: >>10445290

>>10444297
No it is not you goddamn retard. It's pablum for ratheists who think Dawkins is still relevant.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Screen Shot 2019-03-07 at 5.17.5 (...).png, 2MiB, 1452x1108

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 14:17:23 No.10445290 Report

Quoted By: >>10446450

>>10445131
>Richard Dawkins
>One of the most influential writers in evolutionary biology.
>On the front-lines of arguing the case against "intelligent design"
>Helped millions of laypersons understand the explanatory power of the theory of evolution
>A cause for the "change-of-heart" to many former religious people

>>10445131
>Irrelevant

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 22:28:16 No.10446409 Report

Quoted By:

>>10444956
Even if they were they'd probably be peer reviewed by some fucking hack activist in gender studies or race studies.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 22:36:33 No.10446450 Report

Quoted By:

>>10445290
And now the people who run RationalWiki hate him because of his "Islamophobia" and his views on radical feminism.

Go figure.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 23:17:38 No.10446597 Report

Quoted By:

>>10444025
>Most otherkin identify as an animal that is perceived as "cool" or "majestic" in Western culture
most transgenders identify as a gender that is privileged and valued in Western culture, namely female. Transgenders rarely identify as males despite men making up the majority of the population
>If otherkin were truly more like non-humans than humans, then they would not be giving themselves the designation "otherkin" because they would not be able to comprehend and use human language.
If transgender were truly more like their identified gender than their genetic sex, then they would not be giving themselves the designation "transgender" because they would not have their original sexual organs or sex identities.
>We don't truly understand the animals and their thought processes enough to know how someone can identify as one of them.
We don't truly understand females and their thought processes enough to know how someone can identify as one of them.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 23:19:54 No.10446605 Report

Quoted By:

>>10444625
which study? show us.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Mar 2019 23:57:52 No.10446699 Report

Quoted By:

>>10444971
Antihuman

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches