>>10443420>Funny how alarmists only started paying attention to solar activity after it started decreasing from the recent historic maximum.Funny how you respond to a post showing the solar forcing since the industrial revolution while complaining about solar activity being ignored.
>Notoriously omits natural changes in clouds etcNatural changes in clouds are part of a feedback with temperature, it's not a forcing.
>CO2 greenhouse isn't strong enough. That doesn't mean humans didn't cause warming some other way like land use/albedo change.Land use and albedo changes are much weaker than the greenhouse effect, as I've already shown. Forcing from the greenhouse effect is larger than the observed forcing.
>Hot CO2 doesn't mean the CO2 is hot because humans emitted it.LOL. CO2 radiates heat not because humans emitted it but because of the greenhouse effect, that thing you are claiming is weak even though we can measure it directly. The more CO2 there is, the more heat is radiated towards the Earth by CO2, increasing the temperature. So humans are causing the temperature to increase, not "CO2 being hot." If the case for denial is so strong why do you have no clue about the topic you're discussing?
