>>10427778Okay, what is wrong with the belief of "science is about falsifying"? I mean, and I guess this might be my presuppositions, science is about finding objective facts, and to find something "objective" would require it to fall under a criteria that would allow for it to be falsifiable. That is, and this might be a very crude and misrepresentative example, when I think about falsifiable I think about the infinite coin toss example:
That is, probability tells us that flipping a coin an infinite number of times, there is a %100 percent chance it will land on both heads and tails atleast once. But it is still possible for the coin to land on only heads for an infinite number of tosses. And what I mean is, in my conceptualization of falsifiable, is that when we try to find an objective truth, all it takes is one instance of it showing the contrary to disprove the objectivity of it.
I might be parroting the exact same things Popper might have said, but again, this is just how I've conceptualized these ideas in my brain.
though i might be just retarded and misunderstanding everything.
I do believe that the current SJW movement is pretty stupid.
