/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #10414657

36KiB, 632x479, 1510607567154.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 24 Feb 22:18:11 2019 No.10414657 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>10414659 >>10414816 >>10414978 >>10414990 >>10415003 >>10415407 >>10415772 >>10415884 >>10416500 >>10418370

Did the Smithsonian destroy giant's bones as many people claim?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Feb 2019 22:19:28 No.10414659 Report

Quoted By:

>>10414657
No

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Feb 2019 23:18:38 No.10414816 Report

Quoted By: >>10415407

>>10414657
N-no, of course not goyim

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Feb 2019 23:20:07 No.10414823 Report

Quoted By: >>10417066 >>10417858

No but I destroyed 16 years old pussy last night.
AMA

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO images (2).jpg, 48KiB, 387x620

Anonymous Sun 24 Feb 2019 23:56:56 No.10414978 Report

Quoted By: >>10415164 >>10415407

>>10414657
Yes. The ((smithsonian)) is privately owned. They have no real interest in histories that don't fit a certain paradigm.
Pic related. 8'4 skeleton with a doctor and a man from the ((smithsonian)) beside it, confirmed real. Was bought for $500, went to the Smithsonian and never seen since then.
Smithsonian have 8 foot plus skeletons in there own records but the physical evidence is lost or destroyed for whatever reason they want giant humans out of the historical picture.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO hqdefault.jpg, 33KiB, 480x360

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 00:01:17 No.10414990 Report

Quoted By: >>10415007

>>10414657
Finger from dealer in Egypt, he refused to sell but aloud a picture with a note for reference. It was also x-rayed and the bones and tissues are there.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 00:04:33 No.10415003 Report

Quoted By: >>10418370

>>10414657
how did it get up there???

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 00:05:37 No.10415007 Report

Quoted By: >>10415015

>>10414990
how did it not decompose?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 00:07:26 No.10415015 Report

Quoted By:

>>10415007
Egypt is a dessert. Look up how mummies haven't decomposed.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 00:56:59 No.10415164 Report

Quoted By: >>10415702

>>10414978
Your picture is of a fake body at a side show. The Smithsonian was interested in it but did not purchase it after it was found to be fake:
https://strangeremains.com/2018/03/19/unraveling-the-deception-of-the-mississippi-capitols-egyptian-princess/

As usual, /x/tards are gullible fools and should stay in their retard containment board.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 02:33:46 No.10415407 Report

Quoted By:

>>10414657
>>10414978
>>10414816

there is certainly the case of the Pekin man's missing bones. so... some skepticism is healthy.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/world/china-watch/culture/mystery-of-the-missing-bones/

from the "smith" itself

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/mystery-of-the-lost-peking-man-fossils-solved-166415409/

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 05:09:57 No.10415702 Report

Quoted By: >>10415719 >>10415734

>>10415164
The ((Smithsonian)) had it for 13 years on record as real Inspected and measured by Prof. Thomas Wilson, Curator of the department of prehistoric anthropology at the smithsonian and other scientists, And did buy it for $500. It was suddenly dismissed as a hoax 13 years later in the claim it was made from gelatin.
Very likely a cover up to hide the history.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 05:19:45 No.10415719 Report

Quoted By: >>10415740

>>10415702
No they didn't, are you deliberately lying or are you just a gullible retard?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO pol.png, 319KiB, 795x567

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 05:31:35 No.10415734 Report

Quoted By: >>10415751

>>10415702
maybe we need a version of this meme for /x/ and /x/-/pol/ crosstards

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 05:37:25 No.10415740 Report

Quoted By: >>10415757 >>10415773 >>10415777

>>10415719
You moron I have a book on this exact find. That is the exact history to it. But if you want to rule that one as fake I have a ton of others that are real if you want them.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 05:41:11 No.10415751 Report

Quoted By: >>10415876 >>10417584

>>10415734
Shills hammer this every time with no counter claims just ad homenin garbage retorts, ill go find some pics and info and post them.
Also massive oral history from early explorers plus native American oral accounts also.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 05:46:33 No.10415757 Report

Quoted By:

>>10415740
I would like to see a PDF of the entire book(s) you are referring to

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 05:52:51 No.10415772 Report

Quoted By:

>>10414657

https://youtu.be/QYe4Jftejno

Watch this and it might help you out.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 8-foot-mummy-article1~2.jpg, 29KiB, 222x294

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 05:52:55 No.10415773 Report

Quoted By: >>10415809 >>10415832

>>10415740
Oh you have a book! WOW A BOOK. Well it must be correct because it's a BOOK. You fucking gullible mongoloid.

Here's all the contemporary information which shows that it was tested before being purchased and found to be fake. Fake mummies were all the rage at the turn of the century. Now fuck off you flaming faggot.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 05:54:38 No.10415777 Report

Quoted By: >>10415818

>>10415740
So you're just a gullible retard, thanks for clarifying.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 06:27:04 No.10415809 Report

Quoted By: >>10416394

>>10415773
That is the newspaper clipping from the salt lake Tribune, June 7th 1908.

The article I am referring to is from - The world, October 7th 1895 when the skeleton was first discovered. Some 13 years before the claim you have posted.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 20190225_192949.jpg, 3MiB, 4032x3024

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 06:32:37 No.10415818 Report

Quoted By: >>10415844

>>10415777
Salty are we. Lol

Here's a cranium capacity of 2100cc in the Smithsonians own records.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 20190225_193908.jpg, 3MiB, 4032x3024

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 06:44:14 No.10415832 Report

Quoted By: >>10415844

>>10415773
Here is the record from the smithsonian of a skeleton of a full blood sioux. Died in 1878 and was said to be 8 foot tall. It says it right there.
Dimensions even simply state "Giant"

My question is why do people get so butthurt and defensive that there were 8 foot giant humans up until very recently.
What are they hiding?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 06:56:17 No.10415844 Report

Quoted By: >>10415862 >>10415868

>>10415818
>>10415832
what the fuck bro.

if what you're posting is true, irregardless of whatever anyone else thinks, you absolutely need to dump as much as possible ASAP.
do it now anon, i have no time to do spellcheck on my post

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 07:18:18 No.10415862 Report

Quoted By: >>10416991

>>10415844
Research.
Twelfth annual report of the bureau of American ethnology of the Smithsonian institution 1894.
Page 113 - dunleith mounds
Page 117 - Welch mounds
Page 335 - Nelson mound
Page 362 - long island
Page 419 - Kanawha valley
Page 426 - The great Smith mound.

All Smithsonian own records. All giant skeletons 7 foot - 9 foot and artifacts equally large. Go research them.
Giants are officially on record, but covered up for sure.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 20190225_202221.jpg, 4MiB, 4032x3024

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 07:26:39 No.10415868 Report

Quoted By:

>>10415844
This is from a skull reported to have the biggest brain in the western hemisphere on record. The skull was found on the Aleutian islands, Alaska.
On Smithsonian record.
Also reference, Rochester journal, October 5, 1936

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 07:29:06 No.10415876 Report

Quoted By: >>10415893

>>10415751
>just ad homenin garbage retorts

when 99% of your argument centers around trying to find new ways to imply the Smithsonian is jewish, then you officially lose the right to claim ad hominem

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO easter island vs indus valley.jpg, 31KiB, 662x463

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 07:34:39 No.10415884 Report

Quoted By:

>>10414657
Literally thousands of newspaper clippings, claiming a giant race of antiquity and the bones have been sent to the smithsonian etc.
Plenty 8 footers, a massive number of 7 footers. Even some 9 and the odd 10 footers but anything over that I'm even a bit doubtful.
They existed at some point in our past 100%, absolutely no doubt.
Also almost all had double rows of teeth, indicating a separate species of human.
Pic related of connected global ancient language.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO images (9).jpg, 103KiB, 462x663

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 07:42:28 No.10415893 Report

Quoted By: >>10415919

>>10415876
My argument Is, giants existed. Skeletons of large proportions go in to the Smithsonian and never come back out. With proof from their very own records.
Then the Smithsonian lie about it's size and destroy evidence that the find ever existed. Why??
People who hide true history make me sick and they are the enemy. This is the Smithsonian.
Now wake up if you are to dumb to realize the truth.
Or if you are a paid shill just fuck off.
As long as someone here finally realizes history has at least partially been covered up i will be happy.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 08:07:07 No.10415919 Report

Quoted By: >>10415943

>>10415893
>Or if you are a paid shill just fuck off.

when you can convince yourself that any opposition or dissent comes from 'paid shills', you've reached an event horizon of ignorance that no amount of rational argument can rescue you from

sure whatever, giants exist. just keep that talk out of the alley, Dale Gribble

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 08:24:08 No.10415943 Report

Quoted By: >>10417890

>>10415919
So you are one then Lol?
There is enough evidence to make you look like a moron so keep talking.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 13:05:02 No.10416394 Report

Quoted By: >>10416991 >>10417007

>>10415809
Then post the article already. You won't because it doesn't back up your claims that the Smithsonian ever exhibited it or even bought it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 13:14:45 No.10416411 Report

Quoted By:

Many people are spot on. Only the giant penis boners though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 13:52:49 No.10416468 Report

Quoted By:

Thank you for posting all of this

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 14:11:17 No.10416500 Report

Quoted By:

>>10414657
Glorious cactus wild cat is glorious

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 17:49:14 No.10416991 Report

Quoted By: >>10417297

>>10416394
Go and research this
>>10415862

There is research notes, official measurements from their own scientists. Everything is there that proves giant human skeletons were recorded.
You think an entire tribe of people who were 7 foot tall would be known about... Why wouldn't they?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO old_newspaper_articles_on_giants1.jpg, 530KiB, 793x1306

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 17:56:42 No.10417007 Report

Quoted By:

>>10416394
I'll post the exact article when I find it. But do have the article transcribed. In the meantime here are some more articles.
Note that most of the time the bones if intact go to the Smithsonian. Then the trail stops dead. Thousands of giant mound builders skeletons lost, sad history.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 18:21:42 No.10417066 Report

Quoted By: >>10417090

>>10414823
How old are you?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 18:27:46 No.10417090 Report

Quoted By:

>>10417066
27

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 19:44:20 No.10417268 Report

Quoted By: >>10417290 >>10417544

Is there a logical reason why they’d want to destroy giant skeletons, or is this just another case of “muh conspiracies”

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 19:51:14 No.10417290 Report

Quoted By:

>>10417268
To protect the theory of evolution regarding humans and discredit the claims of giants in religious texts.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 19:52:29 No.10417297 Report

Quoted By: >>10417563 >>10417575

>>10416991
There is nothing which says anything about a tribe of giants, just a bunch of exaggerations from /x/tards.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 21:12:55 No.10417544 Report

Quoted By:

>>10417268
It was a racist and religious motive that caused them to be considered no more. There is even a newspaper article around 1900 where giants are declared no more by . Before 1900 it was of great interest when a mound giant was uncovered. But to be covered up to this day there must be a pretty big secret being hidden.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO img.jpg, 87KiB, 546x1107

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 21:18:09 No.10417563 Report

Quoted By: >>10418145

>>10417297
There are countless newspaper articles. Tribes of buried ancient Indians found by workers.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 21:21:04 No.10417575 Report

Quoted By: >>10418145

>>10417297
Research the Smithsonian archive. Exact pages I have referenced. Or I can post the reports if you like later.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 21:23:43 No.10417584 Report

Quoted By: >>10417594

>>10415751
reminder that insulting people is not itself an ad hominem attack

>you're stupid
not an ad hom
>you're wrong because you're stupid
ad hom

know the difference

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 21:26:10 No.10417594 Report

Quoted By: >>10418229

>>10417584
yeah but ad hom means "to the person" so even a simple insult is still ad hom
it's only not ad hominem if you insult their argument, i.e. "that's the most retarded shit i ever heard"

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 22:48:43 No.10417858 Report

Quoted By:

>>10414823
>t. veterinarian

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 22:55:05 No.10417890 Report

Quoted By: >>10418156

>>10415943
shh, careful. if you post stuff like this on this board, they are going to use the mind reader device on you again. you know, the people at the fire station. better stick to /x/. it's a safe board.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Feb 2019 23:38:02 No.10418040 Report

Quoted By:

Anon,

I am The Last Giant. I am 14'2" and my cock is enormous at 6". I have been hiding from Smithsonian thugs (my parents called them 'Sonies) for the past 33 years.

I do not have much longer. They are on my tail. If you are the last people to read this message I want you to know that

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 00:10:21 No.10418145 Report

Quoted By: >>10418207 >>10418213

>>10417563
Did they measure the skeletons spread out on the ground or assembled by an expert? Where are the scientific reports?

>>10417575
I tried and all I get is massive amounts of you retards repeating the same exaggerations over and over again with no evidence.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 00:13:55 No.10418156 Report

Quoted By:

>>10417890
It's all there for the public to find. History is actually a lot different if you take into oral histories from many native cultures and then start finding these skeletons and artifacts to back it up.
Why is history being covered up?
Who is to gain from this lie?
Who will lose from this lie?

You have been fooled

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO images (5).jpg, 49KiB, 678x452

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 00:30:01 No.10418207 Report

Quoted By: >>10418247 >>10418248

>>10418145
If a scientist employed measures an item at 7 foot. It's a measurement, remember he is payed to archive items not to sideshow them. If you call every scientific measurement recorded an exaggeration. Where do you draw a line from anything recorded about history.

What happened was a man named Aleš Hrdli?ka was named the director of anthropology in 1910, he basically declared everything that didn't match modern human proportions all a series of mistakes. No explanations about the mass of reports of femurs that were well out of normal range, all solid evidence destroyed and claimed lost. Hrdli?ka was a racist and also the huge skulls flew in the face of the field of eugenics, which correlated cranial size with intellect, he believed no one lived in the US before 2000bc and opposed any finds refuting his claims.
He did not sound like a man who just wanted the true history of man to me.
Basically he is the point at which giants went from real to myth.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 00:30:37 No.10418213 Report

Quoted By: >>10418248 >>10418259

>>10418145
Science can be as much of a religion as any other. If you are genuinely interested, look into things yourself and don't just wait for 'proof' or you'll never get anywhere. A little bit of intuition goes a long way

Look into ancient architecture of the hindus, egypt, south america, pyramids and ancient quarries in china... If architecture is a reflection of the values of a society, then I'm confident in saying that a very different civilization lived on earth. Modern humans do not treat astronomical and mathematical refinement with the same respect or sacredness

Look into hindu myths and religion, the Hopi tribe, the Ainu, Mayans, Chinese-tibetans...

Ancient artifacts. Gobekli tepe, yonaguni monument, baltic sea anomaly, mayan sacrophagus, nazca lines, global cave paintings, dropa stones, klerksdorp spheres...

All these dots by its own bears little weight but when viewed as a whole a trend emerges that could hint at a truth

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 00:35:47 No.10418229 Report

Quoted By:

>>10417594
nope. not true. an ad hominem is when you use the personal attack to support an argument. if you are careful to keep those separate, you can insult someone all you want and not commit an ad hominem

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 00:42:09 No.10418247 Report

Quoted By: >>10418281

>>10418207
What books would you recommend for someone who's interested in this topic?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 00:42:17 No.10418248 Report

Quoted By: >>10418270 >>10418284

>>10418207
>If a scientist employed measures an item at 7 foot.
The operating word there being "if." You have no idea who measured what.

Here's what actually happened: hoaxes like the Cardiff Giant fueled mass-interest in giants at the turn of the century, leading to newspapers frequently publishing rumors of "giants" because that's what people wanted to hear. This fad quickly fell out of fashion and there is no actual evidence of any of these claims. Not because of a massive conspiracy among all anthropologists, but because it never existed.

>>10418213
>Science can be as much of a religion as any other.
Your hoax-filled conspiracy nonsense is worse than a religion. If you don't provide scientific evidence of your claims then there is no reason to believe a word you say. Simple as that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 00:45:08 No.10418259 Report

Quoted By: >>10418288

>>10418213
This. All the puzzle pieces are There, well enough of them. To be able to form a picture about history that is far different than being told.
Example, how many anons here know of Cahokia, Illinois
That earthen mound is at a site of an ancient American Indian city.
The mound has a base of 14 acres, one acre larger than the great pyramid of giza. It required 22 million cubic feet of soil brought from over a mile away to create the 4 stepped pyramid.

This is a huge monument and barely anybody knows of it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 00:48:34 No.10418270 Report

Quoted By:

>>10418248
The records at the Smithsonian have the prof. Or scientists names with attached finds.

And also science can become like a dogma most certainly, it surely is not a conspiracy. The pope and the cardinals are all these scientific big wigs who do not like the new change and stamp out this heresy. Science and religious hierarchy are similar.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 00:52:03 No.10418281 Report

Quoted By:

>>10418247
Yes. Best book I recommend is this.

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/27236319-giants-on-record

It's about $23 usd

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 00:54:02 No.10418284 Report

Quoted By: >>10418300

>>10418248
>proof
do we not use statistics and probability to derive insight from data sets to make decisions? This is no different but you have to be interested enough to look into it first, or you won't have any data set

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Monks-Mound.jpg, 125KiB, 930x623

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 00:54:45 No.10418288 Report

Quoted By: >>10418295 >>10418298

>>10418259
Cahokia, monks mound Illinois.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 00:57:12 No.10418295 Report

Quoted By: >>10418307

>>10418288
It's a big mound of dirt, how exactly does this change history?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 00:59:14 No.10418298 Report

Quoted By: >>10418305

>>10418288
did you know there are pyramids in Bosnia and Xi An? It's most likely a form of energy infrastructure. It's tempting to think them as ancient and primitive but I only see simplicity and elegance - an eternal, sustainable power source that is indestructible and only made through readily available natural materials and features. All this refined with astronomical and mathematical alignments

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 00:59:21 No.10418300 Report

Quoted By: >>10418341

>>10418284
Rumors and hoaxes are not a data set and will only lead you to incorrect conclusions.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1515194851321.png, 50KiB, 645x729

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 01:00:24 No.10418305 Report

Quoted By: >>10418353

>>10418298

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 01:01:18 No.10418307 Report

Quoted By: >>10418319

>>10418295
Base bigger than the pyramid, how many people know about and visit the pyramids?
I only learnt about Cahokia last year reading about the mound builders culture. Unfortunately since the mound builders were 7-8 foot tall much of the history seems to be suppressed, or at least not easy to find.

You go grab a shovel and start moving 22 millions cubic feet if it sounds that easy.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 01:05:30 No.10418319 Report

Quoted By: >>10418345

>>10418307
The pyramids are made from chiseled stone, much harder to produce, move, and assemble than dirt. They took much more design, effort, and ingenuity than mounds yet were made thousands of years before the mounds.

>Unfortunately since the mound builders were 7-8 foot tall much of the history seems to be suppressed, or at least not easy to find.
You're mentally ill.

>You go grab a shovel and start moving 22 millions cubic feet if it sounds that easy.
Sure, just give me a few thousand workers with woven baskets and a few centuries and it will be very easy.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 01:11:59 No.10418341 Report

Quoted By:

>>10418300
>rumors and hoaxes
Much like genetics memes survived for a reason and it wouldnt be wise to dismiss memes that survived for thousands of years just because we try to be 'scientific'

Back to the topic though, what was mentioned there are neither hoaxes nor rumors. The artifacts and architecture are real and tangible

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 01:13:06 No.10418345 Report

Quoted By:

>>10418319
>it will be very easy.
Says Worlds most unfit person. Key board warrior.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 01:15:22 No.10418353 Report

Quoted By:

>>10418305
tesla's wireless electricity tower works from the same principles upon which the pyramids were built from

He went to the wrong person and had his work forcibly shut down. However there seems to be experiments of modern versions going on though:

https://youtu.be/yTHV_Wk8tao

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 01:20:46 No.10418370 Report

Quoted By: >>10418376

>>10414657
>>10415003
seriously though how did it get up there??

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 01:22:11 No.10418376 Report

Quoted By:

>>10418370
bobcats have super tough paw pads

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 04:41:35 No.10418806 Report

Quoted By: >>10418937

There was a doco about a farmer who found an 8 foot something skeleton with 2 smaller skeletons with it when he was digging on his farm. They were measured and taken away and the farmer in excitement rang to ask about his discovery and was told "in sorry sir that skeleton is only 5'9 in our records"

Any anons know of it or have a link to it?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO GIANT_SKELETONS_CHART.jpg, 79KiB, 520x414

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 06:05:10 No.10418937 Report

Quoted By: >>10418942

>>10418806

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 06:08:15 No.10418942 Report

Quoted By:

>>10418937
Dude, That is just various sized clip-art skeletons with numbers next to them.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Feb 2019 06:12:10 No.10418948 Report

Quoted By:

this thread is so fucking stupid, lol

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches