/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #10398477

144KiB, 964x1324, 1is0.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

SCIENTISTS JUST PROVED THAT 1 IS EQUAL TO 0

Anonymous Mon 18 Feb 20:40:16 2019 No.10398477 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>10398530 >>10398570 >>10398574 >>10398580 >>10398607

pic related is world reknowned, game changing proof of this undeniable fact.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Feb 2019 20:41:15 No.10398479 Report

Quoted By:

Small if false

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Feb 2019 20:48:05 No.10398496 Report

Quoted By: >>10398536

you can't divide by zero because weird shit like that happens.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Feb 2019 21:02:21 No.10398530 Report

Quoted By: >>10398536

>>10398477
>divide by zero
Literally how the FUCK do you divide something into zero parts? It is an impossible operation. You can't just bust a pie into 0 parts. The pie would therefore not exist. And if you have no pies and split them into no parts you never even split anything. So tired of this dumb meme

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Feb 2019 21:04:34 No.10398536 Report

Quoted By: >>10398544 >>10398568 >>10398575 >>10398577

>>10398496
>you can't divide by zero because weird shit like that happens.
>>10398530
>Literally how the FUCK do you divide something into zero parts?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheel_theory

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1543956274382.png, 77KiB, 645x729

Anonymous Mon 18 Feb 2019 21:05:53 No.10398539 Report

Quoted By:

>-0

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Feb 2019 21:09:07 No.10398544 Report

Quoted By:

>>10398536
And if we project it onto a sphere you can have 3 right angles in a triangle.
This equation only works when you make the initial assumption that all fractions must be definable.
If we change the rules, sure, 0=1. If we go by conventional mathematics however, which doesn't treat 0 like any other number. It doesn't work.
If I define infinity to a set value, yes, there are a ton of silly equations I can write, and they'll be true, but that doesn't make me right in all cases.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Feb 2019 21:20:10 No.10398568 Report

Quoted By:

>>10398536
>wheel theory
Nobody give a shit

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Feb 2019 21:22:30 No.10398570 Report

Quoted By:

>>10398477
so many unecessary lines it gave me cancer
also don't divide by 0

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Feb 2019 21:23:29 No.10398574 Report

Quoted By: >>10398621 >>10398776

>>10398477
>this is your brain without philosophy(aka thinking)
LMAOING AT STEMTARD
AHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Feb 2019 21:24:41 No.10398575 Report

Quoted By:

>>10398536
OP still doesn't work in wheels because finicky definitions that force division by zero.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Feb 2019 21:26:10 No.10398577 Report

Quoted By:

>>10398536
learn about limits, then stop being on drugs

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Feb 2019 21:26:48 No.10398580 Report

Quoted By:

>>10398477
>if we introduce a new variable equal to 1 and deduct it from 1 then 1 = 0
Great science. Good proof.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Gooby_car_suspicious.png, 42KiB, 386x269

Anonymous Mon 18 Feb 2019 21:37:19 No.10398607 Report

Quoted By:

>>10398477
>-0

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot_2019-02-18-13-37-10~2.png, 55KiB, 1440x509

Anonymous Mon 18 Feb 2019 21:38:51 No.10398611 Report

Quoted By: >>10398630

Haha im retard too

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Feb 2019 21:41:14 No.10398621 Report

Quoted By: >>10398630

>>10398574
You don't even need to think to know this is false. Dividing by 0 is impossible, any retard knows this.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Feb 2019 21:43:01 No.10398630 Report

Quoted By: >>10398680 >>10398690

>>10398611
>>10398621
dividing by 0 is a conspiracy by the goverment
it's actually possible, but the goverment doesn't want us to know
unless you can prove right now that you have an IQ of 300+ and show why ivision by 0 is impossible you're part of the goverment psy-ops

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Feb 2019 22:10:44 No.10398680 Report

Quoted By: >>10398776

>>10398630
based schizo

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Feb 2019 22:12:54 No.10398690 Report

Quoted By:

>>10398630
Zero times any number is zero because zero means a lack of. A lack of any real number is a lack of anything. Therefore division of a nonzero by 0 is impossible by the definition of division. There is no way to multiply 0 enough times to get to a nonzero. Additionally, division of zero by itself is meaningless because it is equivalent to any real number and thus is not a unique value nor a function. If you used this logic to create a graph of the relation yx = 0 then you would simply have created a system of coordinates rather than an actual graph. You would never write the notation y=0/x because it implies that y is a unique value and thus y=0 for all x=/=0.

Go into wolfram alpha ind try inputting xyz = 0 and notice how it gives the graph of its own three dimensional system of coordinates (albeit in an odd sort of planar form) while xy = 0/z is total nonsense. The computer can't even figure out how to restrict the domain to z=/=0 and gives a useless two dimensional subspace geometry because a lack of anything will always be a lack of anything no matter what you divide it by. God would never have created the universe with such an imprecise and unmanageable equation.

TL:DR;
nonzero/0 impossible

0/0 could be anything or nothing at all; can't be proven either way so it is avoided by mathematical tradition

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Feb 2019 22:56:04 No.10398776 Report

Quoted By:

>>10398680
>>10398574
Its hilarious how STEM tards have been shittinf on philosophy for so long, to only find out that philosophy had figured this shit out centuries ago.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches