>>10276330its not fully explained. we can explain the mechanisms necessary for colour experience as such but it has no explanatory basis as to why certainwavelengths are experienced as certain colours.
>I eagerly await your revolutionary paper explaining the cause of the Big Bang. A billion Nobel prizes.>Please unite quantum mechanics and special relativity if you have time, since it’s “easy”.easier... brainelet. the fact that there are many potential hypotheses shows they are easier. it shows we possess a language and research methodology to talk about those issues. the actual only real issue is empirical backing.
when it comes to qualia or experience this is not the case. as such the issue isnt empirical like the ones above. its about the framework of talking about it and uniting mental and material withojt people asking questions. it doesnt exist.
>>It’s hard to fill this gap so it’s unfillable>Genius.strawmanning AGAIN *Clap clap*. This is not my point at all. yes it might be in the future but pointing out unknown unknowns is fucking redundant. lets actually talk about the problem.
>Fallacious, you mean, and I’m well aware this is about qualia, not just the brain and rocks. the fact i called you cocksucker doesnt suggest an intentional pun?
>>10276331