>>10192737>>10197297>he hasn't derived a proof for god from first principlesand look, the brainlet makes a thread about it too. oh but some guy who probably hasn't even read the ctmu made a shitty iq chart on facebook! not an argument
>>10195851you are close, but not quite. not only this, but in genesis, the universe had to have defined its rules somehow. from the reality principle, reality is all that is real so nothing external to it could have imposed this syntax. what follows is that through self-determinacy (effectively free will) the universe defined its own rules by placing restrictions upon UBT. i think i could have explained it earlier, but who cares? the thread is going to be deleted after i make this post. not that i care.
>>10196147this desu
>>10195910you do not understand what perception is in this discussion. otherwise, it should be rather self-evident that reality does indeed conform to categories or cognitive syntax
this here provides some background behind where he is coming from:
http://megasociety.org/noesis/44/intro.htmlit is a bit annoying that you can talk about metaphysical subjects such as the ctmu in /sci/ or /lit/
