/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #10162080

4MiB, 446x250, TIMESAND___76266725q75qdw3334f16er284y68e14yr4t6e8tr62645635u34548uy4p861.gif

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 23 Nov 22:33:27 2018 No.10162080 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>10162498 >>10162525 >>10162535 >>10162574 >>10162660

Some real numbers are larger than every natural number.
>Real Numbers in the Neighborhood of Infinity
>http://www.vixra.org/abs/1811.0222

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 24 Nov 2018 02:10:47 No.10162498 Report

Quoted By: >>10162516

>>10162080
>Some real numbers are larger than every natural number.
Wow, the Archimedean property of the reals isn't true anymore

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 24 Nov 2018 02:25:46 No.10162516 Report

Quoted By: >>10162538

>>10162498
The Archimedean property states that the reals have no upper bound. This is still true. You'll notice that various statements of the principle, especially those mentioning natural numbers, use concepts which were not in circulation in Sicily 2000 years ago.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1541579017266.jpg, 62KiB, 537x680

Anonymous Sat 24 Nov 2018 02:29:55 No.10162525 Report

Quoted By:

>>10162080
>real numbers
But anon-kun.. Aren't all numbers abstractions? And, Uhm.. Abstractions aren't real?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1838628682862.gif, 3MiB, 480x270

Anonymous Sat 24 Nov 2018 02:34:35 No.10162535 Report

Quoted By:

>>10162080
more nonsensical results derived from the notion of a "real number"
when will mathematicians come to their senses

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 24 Nov 2018 02:36:35 No.10162538 Report

Quoted By: >>10162583

>>10162516
b... but the property of natural number is when N is natural N+1 is natural. that makes archimedean property properly work and just general thing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 24 Nov 2018 03:04:22 No.10162574 Report

Quoted By: >>10162583

>>10162080
>http://www.vixra.org/abs/1811.0222
Maybe it's just going over my head, but this looks like complete nonsense. It's practically notation salad.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 24 Nov 2018 03:11:11 No.10162583 Report

Quoted By:

>>10162538
>The Archimedean property states that the reals have no upper bound

>>10162574
I am the author and I can answer any questions

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 24 Nov 2018 03:18:36 No.10162588 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 24 Nov 2018 04:11:40 No.10162656 Report

Quoted By:

Hi, Jon. You still haven't proved Definition 2.1 is equivalent to definition 2.3. Until you do that, $\infty$ is ill-defined and your paper is nonsense.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 24 Nov 2018 04:13:55 No.10162660 Report

Quoted By:

>>10162080
Let x be a real number larger than all natural numbers.

Then ceiling(x) is a natural number larger than x. Thus x is not a real number larger than all natural numbers.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches