>>10149018I'll take that as a yes
normally that would automatically discard any opinion you have about anything technically related, but since I'm bored here we go
>the whole retarded paragraph about latencyit is true that leo satellite is faster than fiber, however the throughput is absolute dogshit. current systems have 64kbit, because apparently tracking satellites moving at insanely fast speeds and constantly switching them after they disappear from your range is pretty hard
also, what the fuck happens if you're in a city like New York? you're just fucking because there isn't the technology to build an array of satellites which can sustain that many simultaneous connections, even if you combine them into pivot points of access
also, these satellites will be wasted since the rest of the orbit will be mostly nothing
>muh spacex the bestyeah, that's why they recently cancelled falcon 9 and keep reducing the BFR payload.
>muh capital paybackI think you don't exactly the complexity of a system of 12000 satellites maintaining 9 digit connections simultaneously and constantly passing them around
