/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #10059618

114KiB, 416x435, 86s1610ntjm11.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Tue 09 Oct 20:00:20 2018 No.10059618 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>10059644 >>10059676 >>10059880 >>10060098

>lol the paper you cite has a low sample size try again buddy
>umm sweety correlation does not mean causation

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Oct 2018 20:02:02 No.10059625 Report

Quoted By:

100% of those surveyed (sample size 1) think OP is gay

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Oct 2018 20:07:57 No.10059644 Report

Quoted By:

>>10059618
100% of those surveyed (n=2) think OP is a fag

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Oct 2018 20:16:55 No.10059672 Report

Quoted By:

I do not think OP is a gay fag.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Oct 2018 20:20:00 No.10059676 Report

Quoted By:

>>10059618

the possibility of OP not being gay exceed the instrument sensibility

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Oct 2018 20:27:03 No.10059695 Report

Quoted By:

OP is gay because I am college educated and I believe him to be.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Oct 2018 20:31:36 No.10059709 Report

Quoted By:

Multiple studies confirm OP is a fag

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Oct 2018 21:10:16 No.10059778 Report

Quoted By:

100% of those surveyed (n=3) think OP is a fag

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Oct 2018 21:40:52 No.10059838 Report

Quoted By:

100% of those surveyed (n=4) think OP is a fag

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Oct 2018 21:51:08 No.10059861 Report

Quoted By:

>dunning krueger much?
>there's already a consensus about this
>the copenhagen model is true, i couldn't do my job without it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Oct 2018 21:57:49 No.10059868 Report

Quoted By:

>The meme value is under 0.05 so this is factual

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Oct 2018 22:04:22 No.10059880 Report

Quoted By: >>10060221

>>10059618
NPCs need to be barred from using the internet. They should not be allowed to communicate anywhere where the recipient of their words isn't able to get their hands on them.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Oct 2018 22:13:58 No.10059891 Report

Quoted By: >>10059903 >>10059911

explain to me how you can draw anything from a small sample size and expect to paint a big picture.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Oct 2018 22:20:58 No.10059903 Report

Quoted By: >>10059926

>>10059891
you need to at least be in college before posting here.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Oct 2018 22:23:13 No.10059911 Report

Quoted By: >>10059913

>>10059891

you're a big picture.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Oct 2018 22:24:26 No.10059913 Report

Quoted By: >>10059942

>>10059911
for you

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Oct 2018 22:29:47 No.10059926 Report

Quoted By: >>10059935

>>10059903
never took stats cause stats if for fags.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Oct 2018 22:33:21 No.10059935 Report

Quoted By:

>>10059926
>explain to me stats
>stats is for fags

why do you want to be a fag? you already are one.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Oct 2018 22:36:01 No.10059942 Report

Quoted By:

>>10059913

if I pull that small sample size off, will you die?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Oct 2018 23:58:28 No.10060098 Report

Quoted By: >>10060209 >>10060214 >>10060227

>>10059618
Let's be honest: most papers shared online during an argument aren't read by either party. One searches for a paper whose title or summary seems to imply support of their side and the other skims the paper for reasons to dismiss it. It's all intellectually dishonest posturing for the sake of impressing anons and the smartest move is not to play this game of pretend.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 Oct 2018 00:19:13 No.10060130 Report

Quoted By:

100% of those surveyed (n=5) think OP is a fag

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 Oct 2018 01:11:49 No.10060209 Report

Quoted By:

>>10060098
I agree
But as a bystander when I see anons arguing then citing something, I usually take a look at the source and either dismiss it because of something or I learn something, so it can be a bit educational to curious people

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 Oct 2018 01:15:10 No.10060214 Report

Quoted By:

>>10060098
i disagree. i contend that most articles posted online on boards like 4chan are read, thoroughly, and comprehended in full, by both parties.

sauce:
Nagle, A. (2017). Kill all normies: Online culture wars from 4chan and Tumblr to Trump and the alt-right. John Hunt Publishing.

if you disagree then post your sauces

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 Oct 2018 01:20:03 No.10060221 Report

Quoted By:

>>10059880
NPCs don’t exist.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 Oct 2018 01:24:05 No.10060227 Report

Quoted By:

>>10060098
nah, I post some articles that I read through and know, so I can really prove what I'm saying. There are only a handful of these that I use though

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches