>>10677096Those pictures represent cancerous ideas that fuel skepticism regarding detailed descriptions of reality.
Truth is, psychologists/Mensa to protect the money making project of IQs they sequentially cut down proof that learning how to solve puzzles can be learned and improved.
It's true that there is a number representing tests given by people in a specific moment of their life.
It is not true that it relates to genetics and it is absolutely not true that any grand-scale methodology has been applied to see the progress in making tests.
People that keep taking tests often improve,
Mensa and psychologists say "Well, we want to see only the very first approach to the retarded puzzles to understand the speed in which the mind improves???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????"
HAVE YOU EVER TALKED TO A NEUROSCIENTIST THAT STUDIED MATHEMATICS?
THESE PUZZLES ARE A JOKE.
SPEED IN REASONING????
NEURAL PLASTICITY CAN'T BE TESTED OUTSIDE A FULL-TIME STUDY OF PHYSICS IN AN ENVIRONMENT OF GOOD PHYSICISTS?
You can only show intelligence solving the most complex puzzles,
you can try to solve them only know the most complex rules.
End of the story:
Do you want to know if you are intelligent?
Waste your entire life understanding it by studying physics full-time and getting close to who does the same
