>>3775905>you're also wrong faggotAbsolutely nothing I've said is wrong.
>>3775908You are ridiculous and still saying nothing of substance beyond 'u dumb'. It's my best guess that English isn't your first language and that you don't realize that your posts don't make as much sense as you think they do in your head. Still - that's not an excuse for being so arrogant and stupid.
>i'm explaining how it works and you explaining how its doneYou did not explain how it works - I did, by explaining that screen tones use different densities of dots (most commonly dots, but it can be lines & other simple patterns as well) to create a wide range of values from a single color. That's how it works. Your blurb about helping "your brain better separate the planes of the drawing" is irrelevant and useless.
Neither of us has touched upon how its done.
For the OP, and for any other reasonable person who is interested in actually learning more about this, screentones are done several ways:
1). When drawing for manga / comics, the effect is traditionally done using screen tone sheets transferred to your drawing via rubbing the back of them to apply the pattern (like a giant stamp).
2) The patterns can also be done by being burned onto screens, which are use in screen printing (often for art prints, shirts, etc.).
3.) They can be emulated digitally using digital halftone techniques, and printed as is.
Method #1 is extremely outdated and is rarely used today. It is all digitally done, and then digitally printed if need be.
>I'm using as a example to streamline your dumb way and primitive way of thinkingI don't understand why you did this. How was that my "dumb way and primitive way of thinking"? I never brought up the technique of filling in values with the paint bucket tool (though there's anything wrong with filling in values with the paint bucket tool either). You brought this up.
