>>3716053>corporations are not that dumbYou are the idiot here. It is the exact opposite of dumb to avoid even the risk of being sued. Also, why pay for an assload of human moderators to police content when you receive literally nothing but bottom line losses when banning everything that has even the potential to be trafficking and prostitution is both effective and only effects only a small portion of your userbase?
>>3716051>tumblr; child pornChild porn in almost all circumstances (operative word: almost) comes from sex trafficking, not including teenagers being teenagers and posting prepubescent titties online. Did you know that Tumblr maintains liability if the people in that pornographic content sues Tumblr for complacency? That's why the banned it. They literally would have never banned it otherwise. It has nothing to do with advertisers since Tumblr has been consistently hemmoraging users and money since Yahoo bought it, and the last thing they wanted to do was remove a chunk of their userbase, but it was either that or open up the possibility of getting sued.
>>3716057Likely, but you'll probably only see a few distinct changes.
A) Most pornographic content depicting real people will be outright banned on most platforms.
B) Discussion of sexual acts, sexual conduct, or sex in general, whether explicit or implied, will be banned (already the case on Facebook now, and will very likely be the case on other platforms soon)
Pornhub, and parent company Mindgeek, are in for a nightmare scenario. Most of their content is user generated and difficult to moderate due to the nature of video. (It would take literal centuries for one person to watch everything on pornhub, and the library just grows bigger by the day) No idea what they are going to do
con't
