>>3687365Honest critique here. Pros first: it's very clean, the colors themselves are, for the most part, well selected. The way the hair is done is interesting and the highlight of this piece. Now for the negatives: there are so many absurd elements to this at once that just don't belong together. There's so much questionable content that it seems kind of like a joke or an insult, as the anons here have shown. Firstly... what the heck is that on her face? I think perhaps it's blushing, but it's so blobby and spotted that it honestly looks like she has a bad rash. The neck lines that are popping out are messed up. The neck itself is much too wide. The mouth on the face is too low. The bags under her eyes and the odd lip lines make her face look too detailed and unappealing.The hands have no wrists. And.... you know, probably all of that would have MAYBE been passable is it weren't for the thighs. The weird white goop there is just so badly done. The texture is inconsistent and... what is it supposed to be anyway? Semen? Female lubrication?? A birthmark? Alien goo? It looks like her flesh is melting via acid or something.. The color white doesn't match anything else in the picture. A skirt or pants would have been better then those bare legs with those panties - literally anything else would have been more arousing. Also there's this strange lump on her legs where it meets the thighs (her left leg) that doesn't really make sense. It definitely looks like some niche fetish material, and I'm not following it.
I'm not trying to be cruel, i'm just being real. People can't take this drawing seriously because of all those strange factors.
