>>4078726No, it literally means the image is better readable and better at displaying broader values/ sub values, like I said there are no subjective interpretations there. Just a glimpse on this anon's gif
>>4078274 shows you a much richer spectrum of values compared to the other options.
meanwhile your example here
>>4078614 even as thumbnail, shows a lack of the darker values on the left "accurate" side. And that painting is kinda well known for having dark connected shapes and less detail in between. Thus both left and right don't seem very accurate.
Also just because something has been already theorized or discussed so many times doesn't mean that a factually definite conclusion has been reached, or that further insight and improvement should be dismissed. If you're okay being stuck with a mediocre theory as your go-to principle, then that's just your thing.