>>3813453Give me your reasoning on this. Why?
if you can gain that skill, it takes less time fidgeting about with poses and or structures, like kim jung gi. im not saying most people can do that, but its a master equivalencey.
>Is traditional the only way to get better at problem solving? Is there no chance of the artist encountering different problems that increased his problem solving skill in his entire life? Is art the only skill that helps with problem solving?i never said that, now youre just being difficult. it does however help you develop problem solving techniques that can help you in digital art. AGAIN, im not saying its necessary, but it is a skill that can be brought to the digital art table.
>You can do this in digital.no, no you cant. you dont understand what im saying. if you have a 5 foot canvas you have the potential to use extremely big brush strokes that you just cant do in digital art. developing the skill of using those brush strokes can be brought to digital painting, by way of understanding how they work. if you are digitally painting something that is has an extremely large pixel dimension, than previous knowledge of how those brush strokes are going to play with bigger visual areas, are extremely helpful.
>I have tried oil paints.well, its obvious you havent painted on a large canvas.
>I keep asking this, what exactly is this perspective? What are these things that traditional artists notice that digital artist don't and vice versa?you say you have painted but never took the time to notice the differences and smilarities of trad vs digital? they make you think about how to achieve and problem solve in different yet similar ways. the biggest difference being you can take all of what you learn traditionally and convert it to digital, where as you can only take certain things from digital and convert it to traditional. the perspective is just that, a differnt way to look at things.