>>95298112Nice strawman.
I'm not saying that women don't take physical attractiveness to account. In fact, that's one way to measure performance on a man: dude who keeps himself well-fit and groomed obviously shows discipline, good time-management skills, strength, and the ability to provide for himself to uphold a certain level of status. However, some forms of performance is more attractive than others. In general, it's usually the ability to provide beats all the other forms (how high is your income and financial security). Again, I'm not saying this is the only thing they focus on: what I'm saying that this is what has the most influence in their decision making regarding sexual attraction. A physically-gift man (8/10) would be rated something like 5/10 if he has a $50K salary income compared to a not-physically-gifted man (6/10) who makes a 6-figure income - who'd be rated at least around 9/10.
A lot of different evidence supports this:
Women are more likely to date uglier but richer men during times of recession:
Women lower or increase a men's attractiveness by his income
The car you drive can affect how women find you sexually attractive.
Being frugal on the 1st date practically guarantees no sex and follow up: because if you can't go almost all out on what's consider to be your best date (both parties are going to be the nicest they are as well as try to be the most impressive than they usual are), why bother with you with lesser dates?
It's why you see men like pic related fucking killing it.
Why young tight cunts fuck old middle age men.
I don't hate women for this, I understand that they are biologically wired to think like this and women have expectations just like men. Men expect women to be very physically attractive, because subtle ques in body composition gives a subconscious idea/guess of how healthy a female and my potential offspring with her will be. A man risks a lot of resources and potential dangers to even just woo a woman(cont).
