>>106460407I'm amazed that I've now woken up and someone is still trying to tell me how amazing of a game Doom is.
>But he's been doing that?He just told me over and over that it's good because "muh large numbers of enemies and secrets and it's popular and culturally significant!"
>The saddest part is that someone believes thisYes, I do believe a game where the AI's only actions are walk and shoot are dated. The sad part is that someone doesn't believe it. And I've already gone into detail on why it's dated, but you obviously are so blinded by nostalgia that you don't actually care.
If
>>106457607 comes back, I think you and him should know the same thing: you notice how I'm able to say good things about Doom?
>>106456584 But you can't find a single good thing about Halo to say? Just constantly moving goalposts, trying to say I should look at it with rose-tinted goggles because you probably played it when it came out.You ever stop and think that maybe, just maybe, you might lack any self-awareness and that it's ok to admit that a game you like has flaws?
It's easy for me to list flaws about Halo. CE has an overpowered pistol, the weapon variety is the lowest in the series, there's some annoying backtracking, etc. But when someone just constantly goes "old good new bad!" with no justification, it's obvious that you haven't actually played Halo, and you're just parroting from when /v/ told you it was bad.
But I'm not spending any more time replying to you guys, I actually want to play Titanfall 2 and Nongunz today.
Fuck yourselves though. People like you are the reason /v/ is a shithole.
