>>104301465No. and I'm not whoever you've been speaking with.
I simply wanted to point out posting public information for a business isn't a problem in any way shape or form. It doesn't reflect poorly on anyone so I'm not sure why anyone thinks it's a problem.
Releasing private information is a problem. You ignored my request for even a single business that doesn't list that information.
>>104301502>you guysAnother faggot. I'm not arguing on the side of anyone.
Waid is being sued for tortious interference so the other anon you're arguing with is wrong if he thinks it hinges on Waid claiming he doxxed (much word) the businesses... something that is literally impossible to do and something that didn't happen.
Why do both CG and anti-CG people go full retard? You seem to think you're in anyway better than the other cumguzzlers.
Meyers has done nothing wrong legally, you don't need to donate or give a damn if he lives past the end of the day to accept that.
