>>13321858>if you can think of an explanation for life that's better than evolution I'd be glad to hear itby better you are saying an explanation that will please you the most other than evolution
what pleases me is different from what pleases you
the truth would not please you so there is no point in telling it
>and no, "god did it" isn't an explanationGod uppercase, I can't know which god you are talking about otherwise chimp
God did it is an excellent explanation, it doesn't prevent you from asking how He did it, which is the point of science
>it doesn't tell us anything about how it happened just that it was donemaybe if you're a brainlet, but it tells the process was not self-created, it was designed therefore it has an underlying structures or set of rules that can be described (you science idolaters seem to forget science is based on non scientific foundations/assumptions that are just philosophy), this alone solves many foundational issues with science (and even math). it also tells that the Bible is a precise scientific book, and there is a model there for the planet (flat, with a dome, waters above, etc.)
>explain howExplain what chimpy? The cosmology? The origin of life? The timeline so far? I really wish people like me could publish it but apparently "science" doesnt like being questioned
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/94fi9r/flat_earth_phd_thesis_proofs_reasons_for_deception/>inb4 redditif you dont want a discussion dont start it