>>12726791>That energy is going to be released as heat sometimeRight, which is the opposite of heat being sequestered. Just keep digging a deeper hole, you'll get out eventually.
I also find it funny how you accuse me of being pedantic yet continue to defend your incorrect terminology while ignoring the actual point, which is that plants and every other cooling feedback doesn't counter global warming caused by CO2.
>No, I showed how feedback loops leads to behavior that won't be easily predicted long-termNo, you showed the exact opposite, feedback loops creating easily predictable behavior in the long term. Wow, you're stupid.
>By the way, extreme sensitivity to initial conditions is as much as hallmark of chaotic behavior as topological transitivity.Yes, it's a necessary but insufficient condition as you showed. I already explained this to you several times and now you're repeating it back to me as if you just looked up how chaos theory works. A bit late for that.
>Each trial of the system would be able to end at entirely different end behaviorsYou could not, with certainty, predict which outcome happens.
It's not about certainty. Fucking hell. Just stop posting.
>I'm not the one claiming to know the climate in a century.You're the only one who won't provide evidence for his claims.
Good night retard, I'm done schooling you for tonight.
