>>12302773What sort of argument is even this? Honestly I'm starting to think I was stupid to think this board was still capable of actually debating anything, it has become the same type of sectarian/identitarian shitfling that fill the rest of the site. RIP.
>That's what your entire argument is about.My entire argument is that just saying "it'll get hotter" as if it that were in itself a bad thing is not a proper argument. Again, where is the proper comparison with the biomass of older times when it was much much hotter?
>Source?Are you joking? Most of the land of the world is either on hot deserts in china/africa or cold deserts in russia/canada.
>droughtWarmer doesn't mean more drought. Why are you even trying to make this argument?
>Luckily, this analysis has already been done by scientistsI doubt it, even our most powerful computers are incapable of doing the proper calculations which involve the thousands of variables that affect the globe climate. So you tell me, how would they arrive at a conclusion which they lack the proper tools to reach.
>It already has been debated by people much more knowledgeableAppeal to authority isn't an argument. You sound like a religious nutjob.
>>12302801>No, your made up assumptions isn't an implication of what they wroteSo you're saying that calling several different species as "maize" is the proper way to go about? Or that questioning it is "grasping at straws"? I'm being sincere here, why when it comes to climate everyone is so disingenuous? It's really not about trying to see the truth anymore it's just the same tribalist barking you see in politics.
>that this is not the major effect of warmer temperatures"Major" is a subjective word and you know that. Point is I wasn't wrong in my earlier post, warmer climate makes plants grow faster.
>The one selectively quoting and being disingenuous is youI posted an entire article, even though I knew there were some negative points to it, and you call that disingenuous?
