>>12188877I actually often use the Sherlock Holmes example when trying to explain it to people, very nice anon I will say this is about 90% correct.
Do you think women are more emotional than men? I don't understand how this is just a given in literally everyone alive's mind yet you have retards like in this thread that think a man couldn't possibly be born more "emotional" and in tune with other people;s emotions.Strict autists like this dipshit
>>12188421 would look for the reason in hormones most likely, if he was actually smart enough to even get that far, which I doubt he would be.
My point is he would look for something tangible he could quantify and measure. However just like intelligence you cant just cut someone open and find intelligence in their brain, you can only test for and measure the results.
Yes I do think empaths are very observant by nature, very fine details etc but I dont think it is necessarily 100 percent where this ability comes from, in fact it could be backlwars and being an empath makes one more observant, more alert, more conscious. I would wager they are more often in gamma and beta brain wave patterns.
I would wager empaths are not able to be hypnotized (I know I am not susceptible to being hypnotized) due to this hyper state of awareness. There are other more occult abilities (clairvoyance, psychic etc) and explanations as well, ones you arent likely to understand without understanding the occult sciences. I would be glad to offer you sources however if you are interested
