>>11440420>Why? Pretty simple really.You didn't explain what about gravity at the center of the earth you want described.
>You stating gravity is a force also doesn't make sense.Why not?
>Otherwise describing a painting would explain how and why it was created.You fail at basic logic. I said explanations are descriptions, not descriptions are explanations. You didn't ask how and why mass was created but you demand it because this is how a retarded sophist operates.
>The "standard of measure" is completely arbitrary you fucking idiot.How does that respond to my question? Try to read instead of spouting your canned schizo responses.
>If you were and actual scientist you would understand that the subdivisions OF SOMETHING ELSE THAT EXISTS is not "something it and of itself".Where did I say it was, illiterate retard?
>It's like saying "an inch exists".An inch is a unit, not a measurement. An inch of something is a measurement. Retard.
>"Mass" is not a thing in and of itself, which you seem to be confusing it as.What property is "a thing in and of itself" moron?
>It's a measure of "matter"; the "thing " that can be shown to exist.It's a property of matter, not a measure.
>Unless of course you would actually like to explain to me what mass is, something you STILL have not done.I did, you just didn't like the answer.
>An explanation can use several descriptions, what is it that you're trying to prove exactly?No, descriptions are not explanations as you so astutely argued.
>What if I cannot explain one without the other?Then I guess hot and cold don't exist, according to your own retarded standards.
>You literally did, sorry I'm losing you.If I literally did then you would have quoted me doing so. You didn't, because you just make this shit up.
>You can measure whatever the fuck you want, however you want.No, I can't. Making up a measurement is not the same as measuring something.
