/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11405348

139KiB, 607x794, https___s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com_the-drive-cms-content-staging_message-editor%2F1564613995730-asteroiddeflectoraiaapresentation.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 21 Feb 19:15:38 2020 No.11405348 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11407121 >>11407215

https://patents.google.com/patent/US10135366B2/

Is this shit for real? Multiple navy scientist niggas say its 'operable' and managed to get a patent, but theres no way, right?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO unnamed.gif, 14KiB, 512x165

Anonymous Fri 21 Feb 2020 19:56:13 No.11405455 Report

Quoted By:

Pic is Kepler's fractal
https://youtu.be/aB3Z0SD_Xiw

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 11:23:39 No.11407121 Report

Quoted By:

>>11405348
the superconductor he describes shouldn't be that hard to make. has anyone else tried making it?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 12:33:20 No.11407215 Report

Quoted By: >>11407334

>>11405348
>and managed to get a patent
It's relatively easy to 'manage' to get a patent, you don't need proof it would work or a working example

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 13:36:44 No.11407334 Report

Quoted By: >>11407395 >>11407671 >>11407878

>>11407215
yes you do

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 14:10:22 No.11407395 Report

Quoted By: >>11407407 >>11407991 >>11407996

>>11407334
Wrong.

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/crazy.html

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO sheehyletter.jpg, 509KiB, 1586x2064

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 14:18:14 No.11407407 Report

Quoted By: >>11407418 >>11407671 >>11407878

>>11407395
patent was first rejected because it wasn't believable. pay attention in class.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 001.jpg, 51KiB, 600x467

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 14:21:09 No.11407418 Report

Quoted By: >>11407432

>>11407407
So it was accepted because someone in the Navy wrote a letter? Wow, sure proved its believable.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 14:27:07 No.11407432 Report

Quoted By: >>11407442 >>11407671 >>11407878

>>11407418
>lol just some guy in charge of the navy and nukes and shit? biggest coocoo ever xD
how's that retardation working out for you?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 14:34:00 No.11407442 Report

Quoted By: >>11407456 >>11407991

>>11407432
Oh I'm so glad you accept argument from authority:

>To help me understand the underlying theory behind the hybrid craft technology described in the patents, I spoke with Dr. Brian Collett, a Hamilton College physics chair who teaches courses in electromagnetic theory and quantum physics. Collett told me that while patents and peer-reviewed articles about theoretical physics are one thing, the descriptions of the HAUC and the claims in Pais’ research "bear no more resemblance to quantum physics as I understand it than does ‘The Force’ from Star Wars." Moreover, Collett adds, "a working room temperature superconductor would have far more radical uses that are actually within the bounds of possibility" than a hybrid craft that can theoretically create a quantum vacuum around itself.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/28729/docs-show-navy-got-ufo-patent-granted-by-warning-of-similar-chinese-tech-advances

Well I guess that settles it, it's bullshit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 14:35:01 No.11407445 Report

Quoted By: >>11407449

When do you patent?
Do you do it before you create a product or after?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 14:36:49 No.11407449 Report

Quoted By:

>>11407445
Apparently before, since the time between this patent and the creation of the invention is infinite.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 14:39:53 No.11407456 Report

Quoted By: >>11407586

>>11407442
I don't. I accept evidence.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1515194851321.png, 50KiB, 645x729

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 15:56:42 No.11407586 Report

Quoted By: >>11407864

>>11407456
Then why are you talking about what "some guy in charge of the navy" said about the patent application? You have presented no evidence.

Meanwhile actual physicists - not some guy with a PhD in "physiological optics" (aka biology) whose job depends on making it seem like the nutjob he hired is producing something - say it's bullshit. Get fucked schizo.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 16:34:33 No.11407671 Report

Quoted By:

>>11407334
>>11407407
>>11407432
The Patent office has openly stated they are understaffed for the amount of patents that are submitted so they aren't checking if they are viable.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 17:52:30 No.11407864 Report

Quoted By: >>11407878

>>11407586
>You have presented no evidence.
What the fuck are you talking about? I am here to present evidence to you for something in your mind fucking autism kid?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 18:00:58 No.11407878 Report

Quoted By: >>11407909

>>11407864
>What the fuck are you talking about?
I'm talking about your posts

>>11407334
>>11407407
>>11407432

Where you attempt to argue that the patent needs proof it would work or a working example because it was rejected before a letter from the CTO of the NAE. This is obviously nonsense.

>I am here to present evidence to you for something in your mind fucking autism kid?
You are supposed to provide evidence for your retarded argument, yes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 18:10:28 No.11407909 Report

Quoted By: >>11407923 >>11407943

>>11407878
All I said was it was rejected at first for being "not possible" then it was accepted later after being explained further.
If you can disprove this then go ahead. Honestly though I don't give a shit about patent grant rules. All I care about is the physics and if these patents work or not.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 18:16:53 No.11407923 Report

Quoted By:

>>11407909
>If you can disprove this then go ahead.
That's not how science works

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 18:24:53 No.11407943 Report

Quoted By: >>11407974

>>11407909
>All I said was it was rejected at first for being "not possible" then it was accepted later after being explained further.
Where was it explained further? The only thing you presented was a letter telling the patent office to accept it.

>If you can disprove this then go ahead.
Sci fi gibberish does not have to be "disproved." The burden of proof is on you.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 18:32:46 No.11407974 Report

Quoted By: >>11407991 >>11408023 >>11408048

>>11407943
>Sci fi gibberish does not have to be "disproved."
how are people as stupid as you alive? patent grants are sci fi gibberish? holy fucking shitbrain.
you are retarded on multiple levels. secondly i know that youre a total imbecile unable to distinguish two things, but if proof of something is presented or readily available, you actually have to disprove it. you can't just claim the burden of proof is on someone else. did you understand that english, shitbrain? probably not.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 18:39:07 No.11407991 Report

Quoted By: >>11407996

>>11407974
>how are people as stupid as you alive? patent grants are sci fi gibberish?
Haven't we already been over this? See >>11407395 for examples of gibberish patents. See >>11407442 for sci-fi gibberish. Any more of your retardation you'd like to rehash?

>but if proof of something is presented or readily available, you actually have to disprove it.
Then present the proof already. A patent is not proof of anything.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 18:41:22 No.11407996 Report

Quoted By: >>11408055

>>11407991
>Haven't we already been over this? See >>11407395 for examples of gibberish patents
lol, as expected, you are unable to comprehend anything. if you can't understand a simple sentence then don't fucking repy to me again, pleb.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 18:54:38 No.11408023 Report

Quoted By: >>11408086

>>11407974
You're a complete inbred retard. Patents have nothing to do with quite literally anything. It's not about being the first, not about being a novel idea, not about being realistic, not about being scientifically sound... it's just money grubbing nonsense.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 19:03:41 No.11408048 Report

Quoted By: >>11408086

>>11407974
A patent isn't evidence that something exists or works. Especially when the patent is initially denied and only accepted when some dude with a big hat says "just accept it bros please"

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 19:05:36 No.11408055 Report

Quoted By: >>11408086

>>11407996
>hurr you can't comprehend anything
Not an argument, schizo.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 19:16:11 No.11408086 Report

Quoted By: >>11408111

>>11408023
You are a complete inbred retard who thinks I have claimed something I have not. Die.

>>11408048
Haven't said it is you fucking retard.

>>11408055
Correct. Hotdog or not hotdog.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 19:21:51 No.11408111 Report

Quoted By: >>11408129

>>11408086
Take your meds, schizo.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Feb 2020 19:25:56 No.11408129 Report

Quoted By:

>>11408111
Take your butthurt medication, brainlet.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches