>>10965648>I find that hard to believe since it only took a few days for people to figure out from the camera angles and flight speeds that the "Gimbal" video was an IR flare from a faraway plane and the "Go fast" video was just a bird flying high above the sea at a normal speed, but due to the movement of the camera it looked like an object close to the water going fast.I know which videos you're referring to, they're full of shit and based on out of context, straw grasping, cherry picked information, and I'll show you with basic logical anaylsis (though I don't need to as the Navy already confirmed they are legtimate UAPs).
Preliminary statement, the Navy also confirmed that the "Gimbal" and "Go fast" videos were both filmed on the same day, during the 2014 - 15 USS Roosevelt incident of the east coast.
Source:
https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/u-s-navy-releases-dates-of-three-officially-acknowledged-encounters-with-phenomena/>"Gimbal" video was an IR flare from a faraway plane 1) The jets are operating in restricted airspace, nothing can fly there without the pilots and ships being aware of it
2) During training operations, which planes can or can't take off is planned and scheduled long before it actually happens.
3) If there was another jet, it would have been another U.S. navy jet, which means that i) it would have been identified on radar ii) The pilots would have been able to contact each other and clear up confusion
4) The "gimbal" UFO isn't the only UFO that the pilots witnessed, they are seeing several of them, from different jets.
5) Radar on the ships did NOT identify the "Gimbal" UFO as a fighter jet and it should have IF it was a U.S. plane
6) The "Gimbal" UFO is just one instance of a 9 month long string of encounters of UFO's by the USS Roosevelt
7) People who actually understand aeronautics (i.e. not youtube skeptics) confirmed it's not another jet
tldr: there is absolutely no way another jet was confused for several UFO's
