>>13431386>I'm not answering your questions because they're dishonest.How?
>You continually claim to not be assuming materialism yet demand physical proof as the only real standard of evidence.No, I'm not. You're the one saying all proof is physical, therefore I'm demanding physical proof. I would accept nonphysical proof if you had it, but it appears you can't even explain what that would be. You are free to present whatever proof you can for your beliefs. No one is stopping you. So stop making excuses and do it already.
>woah guys the hard problem of consciousness is solved!That's not the hard problem.
>What effect am I claiming they have on each other?You just said they are somehow related.
>are you denying that subjective experience exists?No, in asking you a question. Stop stalling.
>The issue is you make the jump from "I have no reason to believe it's real" to "I believe it's not real".No I don't. It's like saying I believe unicorns aren't real. I don't even bother thinking about unicorns let alone believing anything about them.
>When you move from claiming ignorance to claiming to know one way or anotherUnfortunately for your argument, I didn't.
>Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.It is though. The absence of evidence of WMDs in Iraq increased the probability that WMDs were absent from Iraq.
>PROVE ITOK, take anything with information. Is it in a physical form? Now repeat. Tell me when you find information existing without a physical form.
