>>3042491>>3042490I realized I've been explaining myself inelegantly here so I'll strive to be more succinct: "Homosexual" and "heterosexual" as terms for MODES OF ATTRACTION is simple description, they mean what their etymologies say. But their use as terms for FIXED SEXUALITIES is abject nonsense. The idea that a person can "be heterosexual" or "be homosexual" is nonsense in any sense other than identifying their usual patterns, the reality is that we all experience both homosexual and heterosexual desire all the time, to varying levels. (I don't care that there's a bunch of vapid political rhetoric on this, I care about psychology.)
This is an important distinction because it *normalizes homosexual thoughts* even among those who do not *wish to engage regularly, overtly or even at all in homosexual behaviour.* I awoke to my "bisexuality" in the first place because my desire to see women getting fucked good and hard meant I watched a lot of videos of men mating pressing women, which means staring at a lot of men's asses. After a while I started fantasizing about fucking the guys in their assholes (particularly as they clench and cum) just as often as fucking the girls in theirs.
At first these feelings were associated with some level of guilt and insecurity, and THAT is what I'm railing against here. If a person experiences an attraction, there should never be any shame in it, unless its expression would harm another.
Think about it. How many times have you seen people who are militant about their defense of their sexuality? And it always comes down to rights: the RIGHT to be attracted to only men, or only women, or whatever. It becomes politicised. They get tilted, dogmatic. Before long, lesbians are angrily masturbating while trying not to think about men. That is the consequence of sexual repression, and it's why our society is awash with men who cannot come to terms with their own homosexual desires - men who would rather beat a gay man than fuck him.
