>>2792905On the contrary, my experiences tell me when people are incapable of meeting others on terms not their own.
It's a simple feat to recognize when someone is crossing the line from listener to speaker. Overwriting someone else's expression with their own interpretation. It's the most obvious when they attempt to tell you what you mean. Or feign ignorance while simultaneously trying to correct you. They don't know; but also do?
You can't pull a splinter from someone's hand when there is a log stuck in your eye.
You can see the formulation of
>>2792880 argument.
"completely different people"
Which is misreading "people" as "persons". Individuals, rather than the collective group of
>>2792703 conception.
Pointless sophistry which doesn't reciprocate an understanding, and only challenges the speaker's competency, by holding it subordinate to some irrelevant truth they shine in your eyes. And as you stand stunned by their incorrigibility, they attempt to pilfer something from this encounter that you weren't offering. And stand triumphant in a game only they were playing. And perhaps, privately wondering why their social life is devoid of meaning. And who might have the answers to questions never asked?
