>>2782638It's still mutilated, sorry. I'd like to explain further, but it'd be ineffective for people who don't understand evolutionary concepts and already have a preset bias. And, no, mutilation doesn't have any health benefits. The studies from Africa you see published are flawed btw because the intact groups were never given barrier protection (condoms) while those whose dicks were mutilated were given such afterwards... that's what it all went down to. The WHO is amazing that way with manipulation of data. Wash your dick everyday, use proper protection during sex, have checkups regularly and you're good to go. Worked very well in countries where people don't routinely mutilate their young boys.
And, sorry, correct term is intact, because having a foreskin is the natural state and is not abnormal. You can force your bias and wrong understanding of evolution all you want, but that's what it is. Reality doesn't change because you want it to. But if you insist that having sandpaper consistency to the head of dicks you think are "self-cleaning" because they're mutilated is natural, I can't really stop you there :)
Damn, image limit. Can't post any more Naruto in his natural state anymore :(
