>>2681764Read it again illiterate. The judge doesn't deny that that the law was meant to combat direct exploitation of children.
BUT he decided that satirical simpson's porn is a gateway for the demand of real CP.
Which legislation had "calculated", as if to wash his hands of some attempt to rewrite what he was accused of and extort $3000 fines from him for the potential crimes that someone else *could* committed.
As if viewing cartoon porn is more directly related to the exploitation of a child than the parents creating a child that can potentially be exploited. As if it's yours or someone else's fault that priests molest alter boys because "we" we're shaming pedophiles hard enough.
Of course it was absurd and controversial. Everyone has seen Minority Report. This is why you don't want to live in a country that makes everyone else's thoughts and actions your responsibility.
