>>2532453What's the point of having androids with genitals for aesthetic purposes that are nonfunctional?
I'm struggling to think of a reason besides that it's perhaps negligibly cheaper...but then androids who have no genitals at all would, by that reasoning, be even more cheap.
Like...what is the market for an android with junk that doesn't work? I figure you either get the model with junk or without it, and if it has it, it works. If you think the average person is taking off an android's pants to admire that well-sculpted plastic dick and nothing more...well...lol
also if you're referring to the Eden Club sex bots as the only ones that have working junk, you'd be wrong, see
>>2532029