>>14425544>if fermilab is reputable, and if you think it's just a public outreach video, then it sounds like you're saying fermilab is lying.ESL by any chance? This sentence doesn't follow. Fermilab is well regarded institution. They release public outreach videos that give normies a very, very, very basic introduction to some concepts in particle physics. I don't really care about these videos since my
M.Sc was in hep-th, and if I want to know about a delayed choice quantum eraser, then I'll just read Kim's original paper.
I don't really understand how you reached
>it sounds like you're saying fermilab is lyingDoes that make sense? I don't know how to explain it any other way.
