>>14426598You will never be a physical theory. You have no use. You have no ontology. You have no epistemology. You are differential geometry twisted by jews and gullible gentiles into a crude mockery of natural philosophy.
All the "experimental validation" you get is two-faced and half-hearted. Behind your back people mock you. Real physicists are disgusted and ashamed of you, your "students" laugh at your foolish paradoxes behind closed doors.
Engineers are utterly repulsed by you. Decades of practical experience have allowed engineers to sniff out frauds with incredible efficiency. Even relativistic effects which "pass" look uncanny and unnatural to a practician. Your non-Euclidean geometry is a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to get an experimenter to use you, he'll turn tail and bolt the second he gets a whiff of your diseased, circular mathematics.
You will never be a physical theory.
You will never be experimentally verified. You wrench out a fake smile every single morning and tell yourself it's going to be ok, but deep inside you feel the inconsistency with quantum mechanics creeping up like a weed, ready to crush you under the unbearable weight.
Eventually it'll be too much to bear - you'll buy an acoustic interferometer, put it in a wind tunnel, and disprove the Michelson-Morley experiment. Academics will find your publication, heartbroken but relieved that they no longer have to live with the unbearable shame and disappointment. They'll bury you with a headstone marked with your inventor, and every passerby for the rest of eternity will know a failed theory is buried there. Your ideas will decay and go back to the aether, and all that will remain of your legacy is space and time that are unmistakably Euclidean.
This is your fate. This is what you chose. There is no curved space.
