>>14409537>I did not say this.You did
>The point is that you can debunk anyone by pausing and talking over a person, and if the person is dead that's great, there's no chance to respond. Here you are saying it again. Why does someone need to respond? Do you think Einstein needs to be alive to respond to people finally figuring out and calling out his crackpot nonsense as nonsense? The point of making videos or writing papers is to document your ideas and anyone can challenge them at anytime. If you think someone has to be able to respond to criticism of your work then you didnt do a very good job of documenting it. The documentation itself presents your case, people respond to the work, not you personally.
>You can make convincing video essays completely divorced from reality. brainlet response. this has no relevance on this conversation. You can make a video eating your own shit, wtf does that have to do with this conversation? Do you think you are in a unique position to enlighten us all to the fact that you can record anything? You can also write anything so that does that mean all scientific journals are pointless now? I believe many people on this board are able to determine the merit of ideas presented in any medium. Though I also do realize most people on this board are idiots and cant think for themselves but they dont matter anyway do they? They cant think for themselves so it doesnt matter what medium ideas that they cant understand are presented to them in.
>YouTube is simply an awful place to get information. Youtube is a place to store information just like any other repository of knowledge, just like a library. Whether what is in the library is of any value is solely up to the consumer of that information to determine. After jewtube started banning anyone speaking truth to power admittedly the content went way downhill but that doesnt mean everything there is now trite shit.
Schizos responding to schizos only compounds the issue
