>>14385346notice how in your images the lamination of this aluminium is visible all the way through the aluminium sample, not just at the point where it deformed. Now notice in
>>14385289&
>>14385286how the block is smooth and solid everywhere except the deformation zone. Also notice how the block has not been bent, and in fact is similarly deformed on two opposite faces, with the deformation pointing in opposite directions. The deformation has formed on an otherwise intact ingot. The 2 processes, hydraulic and Hutchison's, don't seem totally comparable.
>>14385357I'm not trolling nor blind. You're simply close-minded. You decided it can't be iron, because you can't fathom the process by which it deformed, so you refuse to see it, and try to come up with elaborate nonsense to avoid the simple truth that it is just a plain, rough ingot of iron.
It's ridiculous, but not an uncommon reaction I'm sad to say.
