>>14308036>t. religious axiomist >doesn't even understand the nature of criticismIt is possible to have an algorithm that could be extended depending on your practical needs. However, no one can perform an infinite number of independent actions. Modern mathematicians assume they can do so without ever being able to do so (axiom of choice). As such, any theory based on any such assumption is filled with paradoxes and other forms of nonsense like the Banach-Tarsky paradox, non-sense like "neighborhoods of infinity," arbitrary cauchy sequences, incalculable (this means that they don't really exist) "real" numbers--let alone no one has ever actually seen a "calculable" "real" number; just resorting to writing a symbol to represent a concept when the only meaningful statements have been approximations using various algorithms.
