>>14273850>You've lied several timesName a single lie. Ive made none
>refuse to defend your claimsName a single one. Ive made none
>I said abiogenesis is firmly in the field of biochemistryPlease stop with this pathetic sophistry. It can't be firmly within a field if it's not a study of that field(its only a niche research topic)
>You gave an article on biochemistry that mentioned abiogenesis and one article that didn't. Mentioning it buried in the bottom in one sentence does not make it firmly within the field.
>Where did I say it does?Where did I say you made a claim it does?
>Please explain who's more qualified. Geophysicists?None on that wiki list, they're all equal. Future man-induced abiogenesis will be due to advances in synthetic chemistry (Tour's expertise) if it ever happens:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijch.201900110 >You were just spouting non-sequiturA direct statement is not a non-sequitur unless it deals with logic That statement did not. I have no idea what your babble is failing to say here bc it doesn't make sense in english
>How so?Using your own statement: I'm not going to spoon feed you information
wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man>I'm talking about biochemists in general I SPECIFICALLY said biochems who research biorenewables
You specifically called THEM experts on biorenewables, a falsehood
This is the most obvious lie you've said so far
>Saying Dave is not worth listening to is just another ad hominem You are using the term ad hominem incorrectly. I'm certain english is not your first language now
>I see no need to since Dave already did it.So you can't form your own arguments and have to rely on a dropout to explain why biochem is superior to synthetic chem for discussing abiogen yet the person making the argument doesn't even have a degree in biochem, thus admitting he's not an expert. I just can't stop laughing at you.
> you will never actually defend Tour. Tour requires no defense whatsoever.
