>>14016763>what caused the big bang?what BANG was the Big-Bangs BANG?
>>14022073>defining Planck length.>Planck length is not constant.Distanced every Planck length is a positron/electron virtual-particle-pair emission-location.
This is the Planck length for distance.
This universe has a set number of these emission-locations.
As space expands these emission-locations get further apart.
Wind back time contracting space back to Big-Bang 0.0.0.0
means all these electron/positron virtual-particle-pair emission-locations is at the same "Dimension-ZERO" 0.0.0.0 singularity.
All these electron/positron particle-pairs erupting forth is the source of Big-Bang.
The Big-Bang singularity broke down into a fixed number of gazillions of particle-pair emission-locations.
This explosive antimatter annihilation between particle-pair emission-locations on a quantum level inside a space small enough to be its own special-condition exerting force between emission-locations is what causes these emission-locations to universally further distance themselves from each other.
>"Antimatter explosive force exerted on a Quantum-scale between Planck-locations within its own special-condition completely decoupled from our time-space and the macro-world of laws"Originally these emission-locations were closer together so the universe experienced "rapid inflation".
Now, with some distance between emission-locations, the expansion has slowed down; because this explosive force is more dissipated within the available space.
Expanding universe is expanding against nothing; therefore there is no resistance to expansion;
Space "Dimension 1,2,3" is scar-material between electron/positron particle-pair emission-locations distancing themselves....
The universe has grown only 1 Planck length (but gazillions of them simultaneously).
The universe
>>14022111 is NOT a FREE-ENERGY device with universe-expansion "work" being done as a free lunch.
"all other virtual-particles are not relevant"
