>>13876443>Don't talk about unrealistic while proposing anything other than renewables to save the planet.This now is basically your religious belief. "Save the planet," you're talking in terms that a member of a climate cult would use. This isn't concrete or scientific, not at all. Even if your leaders decide to dress themselves in lab coats. This is really just a substitute (or rebellion against) real belief in the truth of the word of truth. You have made a substitute for God here and now want to make what you believe based on religious reasons as mandatory by law. This is despite having no evidence that any of your claims mean anything, and no proof that what you suggest won't actually make things worse rather than better.
Worst of all, you have tried to talk over people with real suggestions with your pointless virtue signalling, adding to confusion basically like a mob leader on a witch hunt and chanting slogans that contain no meaning. Sort of like how communist, socialist and others are similar, as I pointed out before. You share in similarities to those ideologies. The parallels with all of those things are easy to be seen, which is why I've pointed them out. The only difference is this time, it's a climate cult. That's literally the only difference.
