>>13803292This anon is on to something. Fuck science and data and shit, that’s for suckers. For instance, I fucked enough girls without condoms that statistically I should have gotten an std by now but I didn’t. So I’ve concluded that stds don’t exist and I’m immune to them, it’s the only explanation. So I’m gonna go out this weekend and take a bunch of poz loads from hiv positive gay men.
>>13803287>there are no experts Ok let’s put it this way. It doesn’t take an expert to calculate the relative risks of taking the vaccine or not, it’s quite trivial really. But there are people who have done that, and since you seem to be unwilling or unable to do that, you should listen to them. I’m really not sure where so many people are encountering a fundamental logic error but it’s happening. It’s like you think you get some sort of bonus from inaction. That you start at a risk of 0 and taking the vaccine is only adding risk to the equation, and that’s not the case. If path 1 is risk 1/1000 of bad outcome and path 2 is risk 1/1001 of bad outcome. Saying path 1 is low risk isn’t an argument for path 1, saying path 2 is not much less risk isn’t an argument. The risk is there and path 2 is less risk, period. This isn’t hard ffs
