Why Climate Change models ignore biofeedbacks
No.13783128 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>13783146 >>13783306 >>13783317 >>13783407 >>13783417 >>13783457 >>13783622 >>13783849 >>13783983 >>13783989 >>13783995 >>13783999 >>13784809 >>13784844 >>13784894 >>13784914 >>13785007 >>13785202 >>13785673 >>13785884 >>13786668 >>13792564 >>13793795 >>13794154 >>13795236 >>13796785 >>13797189 >>13797919
Diatoms (algae in crystal micro-shells) are basically abundant when CO2 goes up and they consume excess CO2.
We also see how plants grow bigger in excess CO2 to absorbe it.
So why we assume models are reliable if so many feedbacks in nature are in place?
We also see how plants grow bigger in excess CO2 to absorbe it.
So why we assume models are reliable if so many feedbacks in nature are in place?
