>>13672903>there's 95% of "stuff" all around us and everywhere that we have no idea what it isAbout 25% is thought to be dark matter and the other 70% is dark energy.
Regarding the dark matter part, this conclusion that 25% of the universe is "invisible magic particles" is based on the supposition that geometry of distant galaxies is the simplest possible one that can be consistent with the 2D images collected by our telescopes. I think a hypothesis about "maybe we're not extrapolating the right 4D shapes from these 2D images of distant galaxies" is more reasonable that "25% of everything is invisible magic particles that are everywhere in the universe but have never been seen." At least the geometry hypothesis deserves equal consideration with the dark matter hypothesis. Instead, it gets ZERO consideration and 100% of people getting research grants focus on the "25% of everything is invisible magic particles" approach to cosmology.
There's another anomaly that does get some consideration which I think gives more credence to the weird geometry hypothesis being better than the invisible particles hypothesis (dark matter.) This result is that the mass of supermassive black holes int he centers of galaxies are correlated with the mass of those galaxies. It is not known why this should be since the black hole is thought to only know about its local area. On the other hand, if there is some weird 4D geometry for galaxies beyond the simplest one consistent with telescope data, that might offer a way to explain the galactic rotation anomaly assigned to dark matter, and also this black hole mass anomaly.
For the 70% dark energy part, I think better than "magic invisible energy" is gravitational interaction with another universe on the other side of the big bang. SCP-001, pic, is about this solution for the missing 70% attributed to dark energy.
