>>13420008>angry at pictures
and of course the logical first step when stating your well reasoned disagreement with someone about interpretations of scientific findings is to start straight off with flinging out the namecalling and insults.
nobody even asked for your opinion>anyone have more science pics like this one?
does not mean that i give a shit if you're angry because of your imaginary internet boogeymen.
at least the rest of us can take some solace from the fact that OP pic drove you to apoplectic paranoia and forced all of those stressful negative neurochemicals in your bloodstream.