/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #13356574

48KiB, 750x500, Dawkins.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 23:53:46 2021 No.13356574 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>13356584 >>13356621 >>13356761

>Destroys his opponents so hard, the only thing they can do in response is posting a fat guy in a funny hat

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 23:57:07 No.13356584 Report

Quoted By: >>13356590

>>13356574
I miss 2014 when atheism vs. religion was hot.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 23:59:15 No.13356590 Report

Quoted By: >>13356609 >>13356627

>>13356584
atheists won. It's over.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Jul 2021 00:06:00 No.13356609 Report

Quoted By: >>13356615

>>13356590
Atheists can never truly win.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Jul 2021 00:07:42 No.13356615 Report

Quoted By: >>13356650

>>13356609
>no one disproved god lmaooo

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Jul 2021 00:11:04 No.13356621 Report

Quoted By: >>13356638 >>13356643

>>13356574
What did Dawkins have to say on rebirth/reincarnation?
He must have been aware of the evidence gathered from children.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Jul 2021 00:12:37 No.13356627 Report

Quoted By: >>13356638

>>13356590
Their prize? Trannies and the steep decline of civilization.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Jul 2021 00:17:22 No.13356638 Report

Quoted By:

>>13356621
what evidence?
>>13356627
>the steep decline of civilization.
you mean black guy in netflix show?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Jul 2021 00:18:14 No.13356643 Report

Quoted By: >>13356654

>>13356621
No one actually talks about Jim Tucker and Ian Stevensons work.

Theres probably a few reasons beyond verifiability

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Jul 2021 00:20:14 No.13356650 Report

Quoted By: >>13356664 >>13356697

>>13356615
Atheists aren't exactly winners, but no god cannot successfully be disproved.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Jul 2021 00:21:16 No.13356654 Report

Quoted By: >>13356691

>>13356643
It makes one wonder why they don't discuss it?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Jul 2021 00:24:04 No.13356664 Report

Quoted By: >>13356672

>>13356650
>but no god cannot successfully be disproved.
is it my ESLism or this sounds nonsensical?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Jul 2021 00:26:32 No.13356672 Report

Quoted By: >>13356676

>>13356664
its a double negative. i think anon meant to say
>no god can
or
>god cannot

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Jul 2021 00:28:58 No.13356676 Report

Quoted By:

>>13356672
yeah. That's still a copium and cheap last resort.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Jul 2021 00:38:07 No.13356691 Report

Quoted By:

>>13356654
Because its not scientifically testable beyond an interview. Its interesting for sure but there are a lot of ways for a child to get the knowledge about previous lives.

Sagan wanted more research in the field

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Jul 2021 00:41:44 No.13356697 Report

Quoted By:

>>13356650
>but no, god cannot successfully be disproved.
I missed a comma

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1592622186196.jpg, 64KiB, 682x682

Anonymous Sun 04 Jul 2021 01:11:29 No.13356761 Report

Quoted By:

>>13356574
"Mr. Dawkins, virtually every civilization in world history was religious. From a Darwinist perspective, if religion was bad for society, wouldn't nonreligious civilizations have out-competed the religious ones?"

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Jul 2021 01:40:30 No.13356852 Report

Quoted By:

Is there anything of Dawkins getting flustered? Besides the "what if you're wrong" QA

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches