>>13375231This recipe of ego satiation, described here
>>13375266 8 is the backbone of most all political activist groups, all of which are headed by these self-righteous people who attack normal people by parading this percieved "intelligence" then attacking or guilt tripping people who don't agree with them. This is most true of "ethical" groups, because economic groups actually have sound arguments to justify their claims beyond delusions of "unquestionable intellectual supremacy"
This is the entire recipe behind the SJW movement. You claim to be "intelligent and enlightened", you then show the stupid people, you tell them to appreciate your "intelligence" and follow you as a leader, and if they don't do this, then you attack them or guilt trip them for questioning your alleged "intelligence". The peasants who try to avoid conflict then either agree with the asshat SJW or otherwise say nothing, causing this problem to exacerbate itself and force more people into joining the SJW movement because they want to avoid being attacked and shamed by these allegedly "intellectually superior" people.
This is my argument. Do you see this happen in your life?
>How often do you interact with people?I interact with very many people all the time and have known many different people from all walks of life. This is just my objective analysis of behavioral trends I see in people.
Surely you can understand where I'm coming from given the additional context, right? You don't notice these behavior patterns and psychological motivations in very commonplace people like SJWs?
Those people all calim to be "Intelligent, educated, academics" for the most part. Presuming this indicates they have an IQ between 100-115+ this behavior pattern os due to a necessity to substantiate a fragile ego based upon the respect of their "intelligence".
People who are not intelligent will satiate their ego through things like sex, athletics, looks, religion, material goods, etc.
